Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/424,823

OSTEOSYNTHESIS PLATE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Priority
Dec 19, 2024 — DE 102024138941.9
Examiner
LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES
Art Unit
3775
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Karl Leibinger Asset Management GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
824 granted / 1117 resolved
+3.8% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1170
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1117 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 22 is objected to because of the following informalities: Midway through the claim a period is present while the claim continues thereafter. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 14-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bottlang et al. (US 2012/0310289). Regarding claim 1, Bottlang et al. disclose an osteosynthesis plate (600, figures 6A-6B) for fixation of bone fragments, comprising a plate body (601) having a top side (see figure below) and an underside (see figure below), the plate body placeable on the bone fragments at the underside of the plate body (figure 6B), wherein the plate body comprises at least one bridge section (see figure below) for bridging a gap between the bone fragments (figure 6B), wherein the plate body comprises a plurality of fixation sections (see figure below) that are located on each side of the at least one bridge section, wherein a fixation point (openings in 605 define the fixation point) is associated with each of the fixation sections, the plate body fixable to the bone fragments at the fixation point of each of the fixation sections (figure 6B), wherein the fixation point on one of the fixation sections is formed on an island section (see figure below) connected to the one of the fixation sections (figures 6A-6B) exclusively via a plurality of spring segments (608’s) that allow for relative displacement of the one of the fixation sections (¶103) and of the island section in an elastically resilient manner (¶103), and wherein at least one of the spring segments is aligned in such that, when a load is applied in a main loading direction of the bone, the island section displaces relative to the one of the fixation sections and a distance between the island section and the at least one bridge section increases (¶103 “in a direction principally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the plate”). Regarding claim 15, Bottlang et al. disclose when the load (B) is applied transversely to the one of the fixation sections, the at least one of the spring segments is aligned at an acute angle to a force vector that represents a transverse force resulting on the one of the fixation points of the island section (if one so chooses). Regarding claim 16, Bottlang et al. disclose the island section is connected to the one of the fixation sections via two spring segments (608’s, figure 6B). Regarding claim 17, Bottlang et al. disclose the island section and the two spring segments are formed by two U-shaped through-openings (606’s, figure 6A), that face each other and are nested inside each other on the one of the fixation sections (figure 6A). Regarding claim 18, Bottlang et al. disclose wherein the spring segments extend point-symmetrically from the island section (figure 6A). Regarding claim 19, Bottlang et al. disclose the spring segments extend asymmetrically to the plate body (figure 6B). Regarding claim 20, Bottlang et al. disclose each of the fixation sections is associated therewith two or more of the fixation points (figures 6A-6B), and each of the two or more of the fixation points (figure 6A-6B) is formed on a respective island section (figures 6A-6B). Regarding claim 21, Bottlang et al. disclose at least one of the spring segments of the two or more of the fixation points is aligned in such a way that the distance increases during the application of the load (¶103). Regarding claim 22, Bottlang et al. disclose of the fixation sections located on each side of the at least one bridge section, the at least one fixation point on the one fixation section is formed on the respective island section, whereas the at least one fixation point on the other fixation section is fixed in place on the other fixation section (figures 6A-6B) the fixation point located on a first one of the fixation sections is formed on a respective island section, and the fixation point on a second one of the fixation sections is fixed on the second one of the fixation sections (figures 6A-6B). Regarding claim 23, Bottlang et al. discloses each of the fixation points is formed on a respective island section on each side of the at least one bridge section (figure 6B). Regarding claim 24, Bottlang et al. disclose at least one of the respective associated spring segments on the island sections of the fixation sections arranged on each side of the bridge section is aligned so as to increase the distance during the application of the load (figures 6A-6B). Regarding claim 25, Bottlang et al. disclose the plate body has exactly one bridge section (figure 6B). Regarding claim 26, Bottlang et al. disclose the plate body comprises a plurality of bridge sections (any section between two respective 605’s/island sections) for bridging a plurality of gaps, and respective fixation sections (figures 6A-6B) are provided on each side of the bridge sections (figures 6A-6B). PNG media_image1.png 737 1083 media_image1.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW JAMES LAWSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7375. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 6:30-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anita Coupe can be reached at 571-270-3614. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW J LAWSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765892
TENDON HARVESTING SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765927
Femur Plate
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765918
DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM AND METHODS OF USE
1y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758401
ORTHOPEDIC LEG ALIGNMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751726
ANKLE REPLACEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.9%)
3y 4m (~2y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1117 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month