Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/426,749

QUICK CONNECTOR SYSTEM, AIRCRAFT CARGO COMPARTMENT, AIRCRAFT, AND METHOD FOR RECONFIGURING AN AIRCRAFT CARGO COMPARTMENT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Priority
Dec 19, 2024 — DE 102024138939.7
Examiner
RODZIWICZ, AARON M
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Telair International GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
403 granted / 573 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
591
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 573 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9, 12-14, 17-18, 20-22, 28-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, lines 8-9 states “can be accommodated or is accommodated” which renders the claim indefinite as the terms “can be accommodated” appear to render the limitations optional, while the term “is accommodated” renders the limitation as required by the invention. The terms appear to be contradicting each other and render the claim indefinite. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point out the limitations being claimed. Claim 1 line 16 states “can be formed or is formed” and Claim 8 line 5 states “can be” which are rejected in the same manner as stated above. Regarding claim 4, line 3 states “at least partially circumferentially” which is indefinite as it is unclear to what degree the collar is circumferentially with respect to the pin axis. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point out the limitations of the claim. The term “lesser width” in claim 5 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “lesser” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The limitations do not disclose the width of the retaining section or the guide section and it is unclear how the widths of each of the elements can be differentiated from one another. Claim 6 uses the term “larger” and is rejected in the same manner. Regarding claim 14, lines 4 and line 5 states the term “its” which is indefinite as it is unclear what the term “its” is referring to. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point out the limitations of the claim. Claim 22 line 4 and Claim 30 line 7 state the term “its” and are also rejected in the same manner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9, 12-14, 17-18, 20-22, 28-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Rose (US 2011/0215203). Regarding claims 1, 12-13, 28-30, Rose discloses a quick connection system for fastening and/or changing components; of an aircraft cargo compartment on at least one structural part of an aircraft structure, comprising: - at least one fastening pin (14), installable on the structural part (1), having a pin longitudinal axis (longitudinal axis of element 14); - at least one connecting area (12), which is arranged or formed on the component and has at least one passage opening (19, 20, Figs. 10, 17c), in which the fastening pin (14) can be accommodated or is accommodated at least in sections (19 or 20) while forming a first form fit (Figs. 20a/b/c) in the pin longitudinal axis (longitudinal axis of element 14) direction and/or transversely to the pin longitudinal axis (longitudinal axis of element 14); and - at least one locking mechanism (16) arranged on the component (Fig. 19d) having at least one engagement element (33), which is movably mounted on the component (Fig. 19d) such that, by a translational or rotational movement (element 33 rotates downward to lock the devices together, Fig. 19d) of the engagement element (33), a second form fit (Figs. 19a-e) can be formed or is formed with the fastening pin (14), the structural part (1), or a mating part (28) installable on the structural part (1), which blocks a movement (the locking mechanism (16) locks the components together restricting movement thereof) of the component (Fig. 19d) in the pin longitudinal axis (longitudinal axis of element 14) and/or transversely to the pin longitudinal axis (longitudinal axis of element 14). Regarding claim 2, Rose discloses wherein the fastening pin (14) has an elongated base body (Fig. 17a) having at least one retaining section (36), which protrudes transversely to the pin longitudinal axis (longitudinal axis of element 14) on the base body (Fig. 17a) in order to form the first form fit (Figs. 20a/b/c) with the connecting area (12) or to form the second form fit (Figs. 19a-e) with the engagement element (33). Regarding claim 3, Rose discloses wherein the fastening pin (14) or several of the fastening pins (14) is or are fastened directly to or on the structural part (1) by screws in the installed state ([0032] the components may be attached to the structure by different means, which may include being screwed on/to/into). Regarding claim 4, Rose discloses wherein the retaining section (36) of the fastening pin (14) comprises at least one collar (13a), which is formed at least partially circumferentially with respect to the pin longitudinal axis (longitudinal axis of element 14). Regarding claim 5, Rose discloses wherein the base body (Fig. 17a) has a guide section (14, 30, 31, 39, 41), which is adjacent to the retaining section (36) and has a lesser width than the retaining section (36). Regarding claim 6, Rose discloses wherein the retaining section (36) has a first diameter (diameter of element 36, Fig. 17a) and the guide section (14, 30, 31, 39, 41) has a second diameter (diameter of elements 14, 30, 31, 39, 41, Fig. 17a), and wherein the first diameter (diameter of element 36, Fig. 17a) of the retaining section (36) is larger than the second diameter (diameter of elements 14, 30, 31, 39, 41, Fig. 17a) of the guide section (14, 30, 31, 39, 41). Regarding claim 7, Rose discloses wherein the passage opening (19, 20, Figs. 10, 17c) of the connecting area (12) is adapted to accommodate the retaining section (36) and/or at least a portion of the base body (Fig. 17a) while forming the first form fit (Figs. 20a/b/c). Regarding claim 8, Rose discloses wherein the passage opening (19, 20, Figs. 10, 17c) of the connecting area (12) has a first opening area (19) and an adjacent second opening area (20), which merge into one another (Figs. 10, 17c), wherein the first opening area (19) is designed so that the retaining section (36) of the fastening pin (14) can be guided through and the second opening area (20) is designed so that the retaining section (36) protrudes outward (Figs. 10, 20c) beyond the second opening area (20). Regarding claim 9, Rose discloses wherein the passage opening (19, 20, Figs. 10, 17c) of the connecting area (12) is keyhole-shaped, elongated hole-shaped, or circular (Fig. 17c). Regarding claim 14, Rose discloses wherein the locking mechanism (16) has at least one extension (38) having a protruding upper edge (top edge of element 38) which holds the rotating handle (33) in its first handle position (up), and has at least one surface set back (42) from the upper edge (top edge of element 38), on which the rotating handle (33) rests in its second handle position (down). Regarding claim 17, Rose discloses wherein at least one support plate (15) and/or at least one bottom plate for supporting the component is provided, which comprises/comprise at least one passage opening ([0251] central opening) for the fastening pin (14). Regarding claim 18, Rose discloses wherein the passage opening ([0251] central opening) of the support plate (15) or the bottom plate has at least one shoulder (37) and the fastening pin (14) has at least one seating section (flat horizontal section between elements 30 and 31), which rests on the shoulder (37) and is accommodated in a form fitting manner (Fig. 20d) in the passage opening ([0251] central opening) of the support plate (15) or the bottom plate. Regarding claim 20, Rose discloses wherein the mating part (28) for engaging the engagement element (33) is part of the support plate, is fastened on the bottom plate, or is arranged in the vicinity (Fig. 19d) of the fastening pin (14). Regarding claim 21, Rose discloses wherein the support plate (15) or the bottom plate has at least one hole pattern section (via elements 47 on element 15) for forming a tiedown point or positioning fitting (Fig. 20a-g), which is arranged in the area of the opening of the mating part (28). Regarding claim 22, Rose discloses wherein the retaining section (36) and/or the guide section (14, 30, 31, 39, 41) of the fastening pin (14) are formed in one piece with its base body (Fig. 17a) or the retaining section and/or the guide section of the fastening pin are part of a sleeve separate from the base body. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Examiner lists referenced documents on PTO-892 because the references present other/alternative or conceptual designs similar in scope that illustrate relevant features, which may demonstrate the level of novelty in comparison to Applicant’s inventive submission. The record relates to Applicant’s identified material and Examiner’s discovered references concerning Applicant’s subject matter relevant for a patentability determination. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON M RODZIWICZ whose telephone number is (571)272-6611. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10 am - 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Michener can be reached at (571) 272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON M RODZIWICZ/Examiner, Art Unit 3642 /JOSHUA J MICHENER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685291
FALSE-DETECTION PREVENTION LITTER BOX
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12685271
PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR GROWING MYCELIUM SHEETS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12677823
APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS TO MANAGE VEGETATION ALONG A RIGHT-OF-WAY
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672645
Automated insect farming installation
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12660793
COMPRESSING INSECTS FOR STORAGE AND RELEASE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 4m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 573 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month