Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 25, 2026
Application No. 19/431,346

BUTT WITH RECOIL ABSORTION FOR ARM OR TOOL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Priority
Dec 23, 2024 — EU 24383453.8
Examiner
ELDRED, JOHN W
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Antonio Andrés Arrom Martorell
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
785 granted / 1010 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1034
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§112
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1010 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 1, “for arm or tool” is alternative and indefinite. First, it is not clear when it would be used for the alternative uses. Second, the term “arm” is unclear because it is not clear how the claimed invention would be useful on a user’s arm but it is not clearly claimed here as being used for a firearm. Also, it is not clear how it could be used on another type of arm, such a pole arm. In claim 1, line 2, “being connected to a firearm body” is unclear in view of the preamble, since the invention can be drawn to a tool instead of a firearm. In claim 1, line 4, “an arm of the intake tube configured to serve as a housing for the intake tube” is vague and unclear. It is not possible for an element to serve as a housing for itself (and in this case the arm is clearly a part of the intake tube itself). In claim 1, 10, “in contact with both the intake tube arm;” is vague and indefinite since it claims contact with two elements (i.e. both) but only specifies one element. In claim 11, “the second braking spring … is arranged in a higher position relative to the second braking spring” is unclear because it claims a contradiction, i.e. an element cannot be higher than itself. In claim 13, “slide on an outside or on an inside of said butt plate” is alternative and indefinite. It is not clear when or how the choice is made where the body will slide. In claim 17, “a butt locking mechanism is configured to block recoil absorption” is vague and indefinite. It is not clear how the claimed element will fulfill the claimed function. It is also not clear what exactly is being locked. Claim 18 is unclear and indefinite since it allow the butt to comprise a part of a tool, but the base claim 1 specifically calls for allowing connection to only a firearm. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Moretti, Boccamazzo et al, and Rigler are cited as being of interest since they disclose stock buffers. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to J. WOODROW ELDRED whose telephone number is (571)272-6901. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J. Woodrow Eldred/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641 JWE
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12716672
MACHINE GUN TRIGGER ASSEMBLY
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716692
PORTABLE BALLISTIC SHIELD WITH INTEGRATED WEAPON BRACKET
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12709965
Shock Resistant Perforating Tool for Multizone Completions
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12704353
SIGHT SYSTEM BASED ON INFRARED IMAGING, LOW-ILLUMINATION IMAGING AND LED AIMING LIGHT SPOT FUSION, AND SPLIT-TYPE FUSION SIGHT
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693096
AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM FOR ANTI-AIRCRAFT COMBAT COMPRIZING COUNTER COUNTER MEASURES DEVICE TO TRIGGER THE COUNTER MEASURE OF THE AIRCRAFT PRIOR LAUNCHING ANTI-AIRCRAFT MISSILE AT THE AIRCRAFT
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 2m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1010 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month