Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/441,681

ACCESSING FUNCTIONS OF EXTERNAL DEVICES USING REALITY INTERFACES

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Priority
Sep 29, 2017 — provisional 62/566,080 +8 more
Examiner
PHAM, LONG D
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
658 granted / 851 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
879
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.7%
+20.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 851 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The references cited in the IDS have been considered by examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1, 4-6 and 12-17 of U.S. Patent No. 11,188,286. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because of the following reason (see table below for details). Current App. No. 19/441,681 U.S. Patent No. 11,188,286 Claim 1. An electronic device, comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing one or more programs configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for: Claim 1. An electronic device, comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing one or more programs configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for: obtaining image data of a physical environment captured by an image sensor; detecting one or more external devices; obtaining image data of a physical environment captured by an image sensor; determining whether the image data includes a representation of a physical appearance of an external device, wherein determining whether the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device comprises: determining whether the image data includes a representation of a physical appearance of a first external device of the one or more detected external devices, wherein determining whether the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device comprises: determining, based on the image data, a probability that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device; and determining, based on the image data, a probability that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device; and determining whether the probability exceeds a predetermined threshold value; and determining whether the probability exceeds a predetermined threshold value; and in accordance with determining that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device, causing a display to concurrently present: in accordance with determining that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device: a view of the physical environment; and causing a display to concurrently display: a representation of the physical environment according to the image data; and an affordance corresponding to a function of the external device, wherein detecting user activation of the displayed affordance causes the external device to perform an action corresponding to the function. an affordance corresponding to a function of the first external device, wherein detecting user activation of the displayed affordance causes the first external device to perform an action corresponding to the function. Claim 2. Claim 4. Claim 3. Claim 5. Claim 4. Claim 6. Claim 5. Claim 12. Claim 6. Claim 13. Claim 7. Claim 14. Claim 8. Claim 15. Claim 9. Claim 16. Claim 10. Claim 17. Claim 11. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing one or more programs configured to be executed by one or more processors of an electronic device, the one or more programs including instructions for: Claim 1. An electronic device, comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing one or more programs configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for: obtaining image data of a physical environment captured by an image sensor; detecting one or more external devices; obtaining image data of a physical environment captured by an image sensor; determining whether the image data includes a representation of a physical appearance of an external device, wherein determining whether the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device comprises: determining whether the image data includes a representation of a physical appearance of a first external device of the one or more detected external devices, wherein determining whether the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device comprises: determining, based on the image data, a probability that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device; and determining, based on the image data, a probability that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device; and determining whether the probability exceeds a predetermined threshold value; and determining whether the probability exceeds a predetermined threshold value; and in accordance with determining that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device, in accordance with determining that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device: causing a display to concurrently present: causing a display to concurrently display: a view of the physical environment; and a representation of the physical environment according to the image data; and an affordance corresponding to a function of the external device, wherein detecting user activation of the displayed affordance causes the external device to perform an action corresponding to the function. an affordance corresponding to a function of the first external device, wherein detecting user activation of the displayed affordance causes the first external device to perform an action corresponding to the function. Claim 12 Claim 4. Claim 13. Claim 5. Claim 14. Claim 6. Claim 15. Claim 12. Claim 16. Claim 13. Claim 17. Claim 17. Claim 18. A method comprising: at an electronic device having a processor and memory: Claim 1. An electronic device, comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing one or more programs configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for: obtaining image data of a physical environment captured by an image sensor; detecting one or more external devices; obtaining image data of a physical environment captured by an image sensor; determining whether the image data includes a representation of a physical appearance of an external device, wherein determining whether the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device comprises: determining whether the image data includes a representation of a physical appearance of a first external device of the one or more detected external devices, wherein determining whether the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device comprises: determining, based on the image data, a probability that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device; and determining, based on the image data, a probability that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device; and determining whether the probability exceeds a predetermined threshold value; and determining whether the probability exceeds a predetermined threshold value; and in accordance with determining that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the external device, in accordance with determining that the image data includes a representation of the physical appearance of the first external device: causing a display to concurrently present: a view of the physical environment; and causing a display to concurrently display: a representation of the physical environment according to the image data; and an affordance corresponding to a function of the external device, wherein detecting user activation of the displayed affordance causes the external device to perform an action corresponding to the function. an affordance corresponding to a function of the first external device, wherein detecting user activation of the displayed affordance causes the first external device to perform an action corresponding to the function. Claim 19. Claim 4. Claim 20. Claim 17. The instant application claim is broader in every aspect than the patent claim and is therefore an obvious variant thereof. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Sarangdhar et al (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2018/0204385) discloses a method and device for obtaining real time status and controlling of transmitting devices. Lopez et al (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2016/0274762) discloses a device interfaction in augmented reality. Chen et al (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2015/0100803) discloses a method for controlling electronic apparatus, handheld electronic apparatus and monitoring system. Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LONG D PHAM whose telephone number is (571)270-5573. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh D Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LONG D PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2026
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12755687
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749458
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744001
DATA DRIVER FOR DISPLAY AND SENSING CIRCUIT THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744006
DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A PLURALITY OF VOLTAGE LINES IN A BEZEL AREA AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743992
LED DISPLAY DRIVING CIRCUIT AND LED DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.6%)
2y 7m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 851 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month