Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 29, 2026
Application No. 19/452,308

FIREARM DISCONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 18, 2026
Examiner
COOPER, JOHN
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Freedom Finger Triggers LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
688 granted / 866 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
891
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 866 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to Application #19/452,308 filed on 18 January 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Claims 6-10 describe the “link element” (400 in the Specification) as interfacing the trigger, or a trigger interface surface. However, element 400, the “link element” according to the Specification, is located away from the trigger 300 (see fig.14). The claims read as though the link element 400 directly interacts with the trigger 300, yet it appears the link element 400 interacts with the trigger bar 320. It is unknown how the link element 400 can interact with the trigger directly, and such operation is not enabled by the Specification. For this examination, the Examiner will interpret the link element to interact with the trigger bar instead of the trigger. Appropriate clarification and/or correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-18, as best understood, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) based upon a public use or sale or other public availability of the invention. NPL, YouTube video “Taurus TX22 Disconnector Swap”, 03 September 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiIpJUUhdto&t=263s Regarding Claims 1-18, the Specification discloses the instant invention is “…a replacement for the factory disconnector of the Taurus TX22 disconnector…” (paragraph 6). See figure 1 below for the replacement disconnector used in the NPL, appearing to be identical to the disconnector of Fig. 11 of the application. Since NPL teaches the same model Taurus TX22 pistol, and what appears to be an identical disconnector, the NPL is considered to clearly anticipate all claims. PNG media_image1.png 1036 1348 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 1 Claim(s) 1-7, 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent 11,959,712 issued to Canny. Regarding Claim 1, Canny discloses a pistol comprising a frame (62), slide (64), trigger (4), a link element pivotally connected to the frame (36); the link element operably responsive to movement of the slide from the battery position to the recoil position to move the trigger from the firing position to the rest position (at least column 8 lines 32-59). Regarding Claim 2, see figs. 11-12. Regarding Claim 3, see upper surface at 30. Regarding Claim 4, see acute angle of element 36 proximate 30 (fig.6). Regarding Claim 5, see 30 movement from fig.5 to fig.6, downward. Regarding Claim 6, as best understood, see lower lobe 40 interfacing trigger bar at 14. Regarding Claim 7, see at least column 8 lines 53-56. Regarding Claim 9, see fig. 5 element 40 where it meets 14, appears to meet the angular limitation. Regarding Claim 10, see fig. 5 element 40 where it meets 14, appears to meet the angular limitation. Regarding Claim 11, see at least column 9 lines 3-10. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see attached PTO-892 for pertinent art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN D COOPER whose telephone number is (571)270-3998. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:30 - 4:30 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TROY CHAMBERS can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN COOPER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2026
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Sep 10, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742622
MULTI-PART PROJECTILE WITH ANTI-ROTATION COATING
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742604
FIREARM MAGAZINE ASSEMBLIES
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742605
MODULAR HANDGUN
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729939
WARHEAD FOR INTERCEPTOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12716681
BREECHLESS PROJECTILE ALIGNMENT MODULE AND LAUNCH METHODS FOR TOY BLASTER APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+17.7%)
1y 8m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 866 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month