Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/455,255

FIREARM TRIGGER MECHANISM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Priority
Jan 21, 2025 — provisional 63/747,715
Examiner
TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Peter Simonson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1080 granted / 1387 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1417
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1387 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 7, 8, 21-23, and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wiese (US 2024/0240895). Re claims 1, 3, 21-23, and 25, Wiese discloses a firing assembly for a firearm, the firing assembly comprising a trigger pull selector assembly comprising a trigger pull selector (Fig 2, 101), the trigger pull selector comprising a first firing position and a second firing position, the first firing position providing a first trigger pull (111) and the second firing position (111) providing a second trigger pull, the second trigger pull being less than the first trigger pull. Re claim 4, 5, and 7, Wiese (Fig 5A) discloses the firing assembly of claim 3, wherein a compression spring (120) acts between the trigger pull selector and the trigger assembly, and in the first firing position has a first degree of compression, and in the second firing position has a second degree of compression, the second degree of compression being less than the first degree of compression. Re claim 8, Wiese (Fig 5A) discloses the firing assembly of claim 7, wherein the trigger pull selector comprises first (120) and second (124) elastomeric compression springs, the first and second elastomeric compression springs contacting a trigger assembly upon selective movement of the trigger pull selector, with the first elastomeric compression spring being in contact with the trigger assembly when the trigger pull selector is in the first firing position, and the second elastomeric compression spring being in contact with the trigger assembly when the trigger pull selector is in the second firing position. Claim(s) 1, 7, and 10-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Malina (US 11,015,894). Re claims 1 and 7, Malina (Fig 1) discloses a firing assembly for a firearm, the firing assembly comprising a trigger pull selector assembly comprising a trigger pull selector (5), the trigger pull selector comprising a first firing position (9) and a second firing position (9), the first firing position providing a first trigger pull and the second firing position providing a second trigger pull, the second trigger pull being less than the first trigger pull. Re claim 10, Malina (Fig 1) discloses the firing assembly of claim 1, wherein the trigger pull selector (5) has an axis of rotation, and an outer surface (outer surfaces of 9) of the trigger pull selector has a graduated distance from the axis of rotation. Re claims 11 and 12, Malina discloses the firing assembly of claim 1, wherein the firing assembly comprises a trigger assembly with a trigger (2) and a trigger arm (12), the trigger arm comprising a trigger pull selector engagement surface (3), and wherein the trigger pull selector has an axis of rotation and a plurality of trigger arm engagement surfaces (9s) circumferentially disposed about an outer surface of the trigger pull selector, wherein rotation of the trigger pull selector about the axis of rotation aligns a different one of the plurality of trigger arm engagement surfaces with the trigger pull selector engagement surface of the trigger arm, at least one of the trigger arm engagement surfaces being a high trigger pull engagement surface, and another of the trigger arm engagement surfaces being a low trigger pull engagement surface (Fig 3). Claim(s) 1-3, 14, and 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Larson et al. (US 9,869,522), hereinafter (“Larson”). Re claims 1-3, 14, and 24, Larson discloses a firing assembly for a firearm, the firing assembly comprising a trigger pull selector assembly comprising a trigger pull selector (Fig 15), the trigger pull selector comprising a first firing position and a second firing position, the first firing position providing a first trigger pull and the second firing position providing a second trigger pull, the second trigger pull capable of being less than the first trigger pull. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6, 9, 13 and 15-20 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REGINALD S TILLMAN, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-7010. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 830-530. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REGINALD S TILLMAN, JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 21, 2026
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702772
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DETECTING INCORRECT CONNECTIONS IN A HUMIDIFICATION SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704343
SHOOTING REST AND SUPPORT SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704338
TRIGGER DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704335
HANDGUN AND MAGAZINE THEREFOR
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698943
TRIGGER ASSEMBLY WITH SAFETY FEATURES
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+11.2%)
1y 11m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1387 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month