Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/459,391

SOYBEAN VARIETY 5PKTK47

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Priority
Feb 28, 2025 — provisional 63/765,159
Examiner
DEVEAU ROSEN, JASON
Art Unit
1662
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Pioneer Hi-bred International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
674 granted / 842 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
876
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 842 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 1-20 are pending and examined. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: the specification lacks the deposit NCMA Accession No. and deposit date (p. 56, ¶ 0179). Appropriate action is advised. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b), as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 1, 4, 7, 13, 16, 17 and 19 recite the limitation “5PKTK47”, while claims 1, 4, 18 and 19 recite the limitation “NCMA Accession Number XXX”. The metes and bounds of the claim are indefinite because “5PKTK47” is not an arbitrary designation that is not an art recognized term such that one would not know what is or is not encompassed by the claims. Claim 2-3, 5, 6, 8-12, 14, 15 and 20 are rejected for depending upon a rejected base claim and for failing to remedy the issues of indefiniteness. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) as containing subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Since the seed claimed is essential to the claimed invention, it must be obtainable by a reproducible method set forth in the specification or otherwise be readily available to the public. If a seed is not so obtainable or available, a deposit thereof may satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112. The specification teaches that variety 5PKTK47 was produced from a cross between 5PFDW56 and GF54201433 (e.g., see ¶ 0180). However, the specification does not disclose a reproducible process to obtain the exact same seed in each occurrence and it is not apparent if such a seed is readily available to the public. If the deposit of the seed is made under the terms of the Budapest Treaty, then an affidavit or declaration by the Applicant, or a statement by an attorney of record over his or her signature and registration number, stating the seed have been deposited under the Budapest Treaty and that the seed will be irrevocably, and without restriction or condition, released to the public upon the issuance of a patent would satisfy the deposit requirement made herein. A minimum deposit of 625 seeds is considered sufficient in the ordinary case to assure availability through the period for which a deposit must be maintained. If the deposit has not been made under the Budapest Treaty, then in order to certify that the deposit meets the criteria set forth in 37 CFR 1.801-1.809, Applicant may provide assurance of compliance by an affidavit or declaration, or by a statement by an attorney of record over his or her signature and registration number showing that (a) during the pendency of the application, access to the invention will be afforded to the Commissioner upon request; (b) all restrictions upon availability to the public will be irrevocably removed upon granting of the patent; (c) the deposit will be maintained in a public depository for a period of 30 years or 5 years after the last request or for the enforceable life of the patent, whichever is longer; (d) the viability of the biological material at the time of deposit will be tested (see 37 CFR 1.807); and (e) the deposit will be replaced if it should ever become unviable. Applicant has NOT deposited the seeds at the NCMA in accordance with 37 CFR 1.801-1.809 by indicating all restrictions upon availability to the public will be irrevocably removed upon granting of the patent. Applicant has also not indicated an intention to deposit the seeds in accordance with the Budapest Treaty, and by way of affidavit or declaration by the Applicant, or a statement by an attorney of record over his or her signature and registration number, stated that the seed will be irrevocably, and without restriction or condition, released to the public upon the issuance of a patent. Accordingly, Applicant needs to provide a signed statement indicating compliance with 37 CFR 1.801-1.809, the NCMA Accession No. and evidence of deposit to overcome this rejection. Alternatively, Applicant may by way of affidavit or declaration by the Applicant, or a statement by an attorney of record over his or her signature and registration number, state that the seed will be irrevocably, and without restriction or condition, released to the public upon the issuance of a patent. Compliance with this requirement may be held in abeyance until the application is otherwise in condition for an allowance. Conclusion No claim is allowed. The closest prior art is Owen (Patent No. US 10,470,425 B1) which teaches soybean variety 01067783 having many of the same characteristics as instantly claimed soybean variety 5PKTK47 (col. 4, Table 1). However, soybean variety 01067783 does not have all of the characteristics of the instantly claimed variety, and the breeding history used to arrive at soybean variety 01067783 differs from that used to arrive at the instantly claimed variety. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON DEVEAU-ROSEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2828. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30am - 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bratislav Stankovic can be reached at (571)270-0305. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON DEVEAU ROSEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1662
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 26, 2026
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765489
WHEAT VARIETY KS12D03-1
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765502
ALFALFA VARIETY R0419A3140
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765494
INBRED CORN LINE KW7ER1836
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12751414
COTTON VARIETY 20R741B3XF
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751390
Fusarium Resistance in Celery
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.3%)
2y 6m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 842 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month