Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/463,770

RUBBER COMPOUND REINFORCED WITH LOW-MODULUS FIBERS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Priority
Oct 13, 2015 — provisional 62/240,876 +6 more
Examiner
FREAY, CHARLES GRANT
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Abaco Drilling Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
978 granted / 1270 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1302
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
35.6%
-4.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1270 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: the status of parent application 19/205,460 should be updated. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The limitation that “the fiber reinforcement includes a fiber loading of greater than 0.5 phr of fibers” is new matter. The closest disclosure to this limitation is in paragraph [0030] which sets forth a fiber loading of 1.0 to about 20.0 phr. The original disclosure does not provide or teach fiber loadings as low as 0.5 phr. Claim 4 is similarly confusing. Similarly, in claim 5 the phr range of 1.0 to 6.0 is new matter, in claim 12 the phr range of 1.5 to 6.0 is new matter, and in claim 18 the phr range of 1.5 to 20.0 is new matter. The specification at [0038] describes a phr range of 2.5 to 6.0, at [0076] describes a phr range of 1.8 to 5.0, and at [00107] describes a phr range of 1.8 to 6.0. The claimed ranges are not set forth and are therefore new matter. The limitations setting forth that “at least some of the fibers have a Modulus of at least 0.5 GPa” (claims 1, 8 &15), “between 0.5 GPa and 4.0 GPa” (claims 2, 9 &16), and “between 0.5 GPa and 14.0 GPa” (claims 3, 10 & 17) are new matter. Claims not specifically mentioned are rejected for their dependence from one of the above claims. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In the last line of each of independent claims 1, 8 and 15 the reference to “a Modulus” is unclear. It is noted that tensile Modulus’s for the “with the grain” and “across the grain” values have been set forth earlier in the claim and it is unclear if this reference to Modulus is a new Modulus value or a reference to one of the earlier tensile Modulus values. Additionally, it is unclear what type of Modulus is being referred to. As set forth in the specification at [0006] “consistent with applicable standards such as ASTM D412, terms such as “Young’s Modulus”, “Modulus of elasticity”, “tensile Modulus”, or just “Modulus” (as used in this disclosure) are interchangeable to describe a parameter representing the general propensity of a material to deform (elongate) under a tensile stress load”. While each of the values may represent a propensity to deform under tension the variables of Elastic Modulus or Young’s Modulus are broader than this. Elastic Modulus and Young’s Modulus may be representative of materials under tension, compression, bending and twisting; while tensile Modulus is only representative of solid material under tension. Therefore, it is unclear which type of Modulus is being referenced by “a Modulus”. Dependent claims 2, 3, 9, 10, 16 and 17 are similarly confusing. Claims not specifically mentioned are indefinite since they depend from one of the above claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES G FREAY whose telephone number is (571)272-4827. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri: 8:00 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Essama Omgba can be reached at (469)295-9278. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES G FREAY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3746 CGF September 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2026
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12758755
DISSOLVABLE MICRONEEDLE PATCH AND METHOD TO PRODUCE DISSOLVABLE MICRONEEDLE PATCH
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752230
AIR FILTRATION ASSEMBLY
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747730
AIR COMPRESSOR
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742447
SINGLE STAGE RECIPROCATING PISTON COMPRESSOR WITH COOLING
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728213
GEAR PUMP FOR MICROVAPORIZER CARTRIDGE
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.3%)
2y 11m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1270 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month