Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 26, 2026
Application No. 19/469,528

MOTOR UNIT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 26, 2025
Priority
May 15, 2023 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2023018024
Examiner
MACARTHUR, VICTOR L
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Mobility Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
717 granted / 1082 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1123
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§112
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1082 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1 and 2) in the reply filed on 8/26/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 3-11 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The claimed elements are so closely labeled as to cause clarity issues. For instance, it is unclear whether the line 17 recitation of “the cooling oil outlet port” is to refer to the previous line 16 “a cooling oil outlet port” or to the previous line 15 “a cooling oil outlet port of the oil pump”. The examiner suggests labeling all elements clearly and distinctly, e.g., oil pump outlet port, oil cooler outlet port, first oil path, second oil path, motor housing oil pan, gear case oil pan, etc. See MPEP 2173.05(o) which states "where a claim directed to a device can be read to include the same element twice, the claim may be indefinite. Ix parte Kristensen, 10 USPQ2d 1701 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1989)". Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or (a)(2) as being anticipated by Yamaguchi US10868452. Claim 1. A motor unit comprising: an electric motor (2) including: a rotor (20); a stator (30); and a housing (61) that internally houses the rotor and the stator, the housing having: an upper portion (upper portion of 61) where an oil path (92c) where a cooling oil (O, “the oil O functions as both a cooling oil and a lubricating oil…”) flows and an outlet path (outlet path of 92c) where the cooling oil is discharged from the oil path toward the stator are formed; and a lower portion (lower portion of 61) having a cooling oil storage unit (81a); a reducer (4) including: a reducer mechanism (4) including a plurality of gears (41, 42, 43, 51); and a gear case (62) that internally houses the reducer mechanism, and has a lower portion (lower portion of 62) having a cooling oil storage unit (82a) communicating with the storage unit in the housing (O flows from 81a to 82a via 68 in fig.1; col.4, ll.26-29), the reducer having a second end surface (end surface of 62 mounted on 61 in fig.4) on which a first end surface (end surface of 61 mounted on 62 in fig.4) of the electric motor is mounted, and to transmit power from the electric motor at a reduced rotation speed (col.5, ll.45-55); an oil pump (96) that is mounted on a first end surface (surface 96 is mounted to in fig.1) of the reducer, and to draw up the cooling oil accumulated in the storage unit in the gear case, and to cause the cooling oil to circulate through the oil path in the housing; and an oil cooler (97) that is mounted on the first end surface of the reducer, has an inlet port (inlet port of 97) which is connected to a cooling oil outlet port (outlet port of 96 connected to 97 in fig.1) of the oil pump, cools the cooling oil from the outlet port of the oil pump, and has a cooling oil outlet port (outlet port of 97) where the cooled cooling oil is discharged into a cooling oil flow path (92) between the cooling oil outlet port (the outlet port of the oil cooler as best understood, see 35 USC 112 rejections) and an inlet port (inlet port of 92c) of the oil path in the housing. Claim 2. The motor unit according to claim 1, wherein the cooling oil storage unit in the housing is an oil pan (81a), the cooling oil storage unit in the gear case is an oil pan (82a), and a cooling oil intake port (92a) of the oil pump is immersed in the oil pan of the gear case below a rotational axis (J4 or J5) of a gear rotational shaft (45 or 55) of the reducer coupled with a rotational shaft (21) of the rotor of the electric motor. Regarding the label “oil pan” note that where there is physical identity between the subject matter of the claim and the prior art, the label given to the claimed subject matter does not distinguish the invention over the prior art. In re Pearson, 494 F. 2d 1399, 1403, 181 USPQ 641, 644 (CCPA 1974); In re Lemin, 326 F. 2d 437, 140 USPQ 273 (CCPA 1964). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICTOR L MACARTHUR whose telephone number is (571)272-7085. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /VICTOR L MACARTHUR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741759
RADICAL LATCH INTERFACE SYSTEM
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728952
Bottom bracket gearshift for an electric bicycle and electric bicycle with such a bottom bracket gearshift
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729763
SHIFT DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729755
PINION GEAR UNIT AND SWIVEL ACTUATOR USING SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12709016
PROCESS TOOL TENDING ROBOTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+12.8%)
3y 0m (~2y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1082 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month