Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/472,455

OPTICAL LEATHER ON A VEHICLE STEERING WHEEL

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 03, 2025
Priority
Apr 04, 2023 — FR 2303310 +1 more
Examiner
GONZALEZ, LUIS A
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Autoliv Development AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
908 granted / 1070 resolved
+32.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1104
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1070 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities: The phrase “the cover element” should be replaced with --the flexible cover element--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 13, the phrase "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations (“arranged so as to face a light diffusion region of the lighting device”) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. Correction is required. Regarding claim 19, the phrase "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations (“the housing opening is arranged to diffuse the light of the lighting device”) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. Correction is required. Regarding claim 19, it appears the “support” of claim 1 and the “housing” of claim 19 are both referring to the same element (41). Clarification of correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11, 14-17, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xu et al. CN 114684244 A (hereinafter “Xu”, previously cited in an IDS). Regarding claim 11, Xu discloses a vehicle steering wheel comprising: a frame (rigid body 151, shown in FIGS. 2-3); a lighting device (light emitter 210, circuit board 220) arranged to emit light towards a user; a flexible cover element (light-transmissive cover 130, includes a cover body 131 and a connection portion 132) at least partially covering the lighting device, the flexible cover element being at least partially permeable (“portion 1310 of the cover body 131 corresponding to the cutout 111 of the cover 110 is made of a transparent material (e.g., Polycarbonate (PC), Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), Polyamide (PA), etc.,” and “the light-transmissive cover of the present invention is not limited thereto, and for example, in some cases, the cover body of the light-transmissive cover may be entirely formed of a transparent material“) to light, and a support (housing 120) arranged between the frame and the flexible cover element, wherein the flexible cover element comprises at least one protuberance (132) arranged at least partially in at least one recess of the support (refer to FIG. 2 or FIG. 3). Note: The phrase “flexible” is a very broad to include any material or object that is capable of any amount of bend. Regarding claim 14, Xu discloses wherein the at least one protuberance is permeable to light (130 is translucent). Regarding claim 15, Xu discloses wherein the at least one protuberance is arranged in a region through which the light of the lighting device does not pass. Regarding claim 16, Xu discloses wherein the at least one protuberance is formed or imprinted entirely with the flexible cover element. Regarding claim 17, as best understood, Xu discloses wherein the at least one protuberance is overmolded (formed as one member) or glued on the flexible cover element. Regarding claim 19, further comprising a housing (12) having a housing opening which is arranged to house the at least one protuberance. Regarding claim 20, a motor vehicle (automobile) comprising a vehicle steering wheel according to claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUIS A GONZALEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-3094. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUIS A GONZALEZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 03, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735286
SHEET CONVEYANCE DEVICE
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722917
FEEDER MODULE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12709512
MEDIA EJECTING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-EXECUTABLE MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12692109
IMAGE RECORDING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD OF IMAGE RECORDING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692119
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEDIA MANIPULATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 1m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1070 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month