Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/473,951

MEANDERING CORRECTION APPARATUS FOR METAL STRIP AND MEANDERING CORRECTION METHOD FOR METAL STRIP

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 09, 2025
Priority
Apr 11, 2023 — JP 2023-063919 +1 more
Examiner
SANDERS, HOWARD J
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
JFE Steel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
712 granted / 878 resolved
+29.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
912
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 878 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: a first control unit in claim 1 understood as element 6 and a second control unit in claim 1 understood as element 7. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP 5600452 (“JP ‘452”). Regarding claim 1, JP ‘452 disclosed a meandering correction apparatus for correcting meandering of a metal strip conveyed along a threading line, characterized in that the meandering correction apparatus comprises: a first meandering amount detection unit (22) that is disposed at a meandering control target position of the metal strip and detects a first meandering amount of the metal strip; a steering roll (20) disposed to correct the first meandering amount; a tilting device for the steering roll (as described in the translation); a second meandering amount detection unit (21) that is disposed on a downstream side of the steering roll along the threading line and on an upstream side of the meandering control target position along the threading line and detects a second meandering amount of the metal strip (see Figure 1); a first control unit (part of 23) that corrects a shift amount at the meandering control target position based on the first meandering amount (22a) by taking into consideration a conveyance time taken from a position of the steering roll to the meandering control target position (as described in the translation); and a second control (including 27 and part of 23) unit that controls a position of the metal strip in a width direction with the steering roll based on the second meandering amount (21a) and the corrected shift amount. Regarding claim 2, JP ‘452 disclosed a method for correcting meandering of a metal strip conveyed along a threading line, characterized in that the method comprises: a step of detecting a first meandering amount at a meandering control target position of the metal strip (using 22); a step of tilting a steering roll (20) to control a shift amount at the meandering control target position; a step of detecting a second meandering amount on a downstream side of the steering roll along the threading line and on an upstream side of the meandering control target position along the threading line (using 21); a step of correcting a shift amount at the meandering control target position based on the first meandering amount (22a) by taking into consideration a conveyance time taken from a position of the steering roll to the meandering control target position; and a step of controlling a position of the metal strip in a width direction with the steering roll based on the second meandering amount (21a) and the corrected shift amount. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. JP H06345304 and JP 3176855 both teach the claimed invention as well. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOWARD J SANDERS whose telephone number is (571)270-3096. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at (571) 272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOWARD J SANDERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 09, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747118
SHEET FEEDING APPARATUS, IMAGE READING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741839
SKEW CORRECTION DEVICE AND MEDIUM PROCESSING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741834
MODULAR FEEDER
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735289
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF REVERSING SHEET CONVEYANCE DIRECTION
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729085
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPENSING A PRINTED DOCUMENT FROM A PRINTER MACHINE USING A DISPENSING DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 3m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 878 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month