Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 19/478,906

ADAPTER ASSEMBLIES FOR SURGICAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Priority
Apr 27, 2023 — provisional 63/462,302 +1 more
Examiner
CHUKWURAH, NATHANIEL C
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Covidien L.P.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1261 granted / 1485 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1512
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1485 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Examiner’s Comments This office action is in response to the application filed on 10/27/2025. Claims 1-20 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/27/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Beardsley (US 20180250005). With regard to claim 11, Beardsley discloses an articulation assembly for use with a surgical device (10), the articulation assembly (400) comprising: a first articulation member (402, 404) disposed in mechanical cooperation with an end effector assembly (600) of the surgical device; a second articulation member (406, 408) disposed in mechanical cooperation with the end effector assembly (600) of the surgical device (10); a first spring-loaded articulation mechanism (338, 338) disposed in mechanical cooperation with the first articulation member, the first spring-loaded articulation mechanism (338) including a first distal linkage (342, 346), a first stop member (end of bas passage 316), and a first biasing member (338), the first biasing member (338) disposed between the first distal linkage (402) and the first stop member (end of bar passage 316); and a second spring-loaded articulation mechanism (338) disposed in mechanical cooperation with the second articulation member (406, 408), the second spring-loaded articulation mechanism including a second distal linkage (408), a second stop member (end of bar passage 316), and a second biasing member (338), the second biasing member disposed between the second distal linkage ( 408) and the second stop member (end of bar passage 316), wherein distal movement of the first articulation member relative to the first stop member (end of bar passage 316) results in the first biasing member (338) moving toward an expanded orientation. With regard to claim 12, Beardsley discloses an articulation assembly for use with a surgical device (10), wherein proximal movement of the second articulation member (406, 408) relative to the second stop member (end of bar passage 316) results in the second biasing member (338) moving toward a compressed orientation. With regard to claim 13, Beardsley discloses an articulation assembly for use with a surgical device (10), wherein the first biasing member (338) is configured to move toward the expanded orientation at the same time as the second biasing member (338) moves toward the compressed orientation. With regard to claim 14, Beardsley discloses an articulation assembly for use with a surgical device (10), wherein the first distal linkage (406) is directly engaged with the first articulation member (392). With regard to claim 15, Beardsley discloses an articulation assembly for use with a surgical device (10), wherein the first distal linkage (406) is fixed from longitudinal movement relative to the first articulation member (360). With regard to claim 16, Beardsley discloses an articulation assembly for use with a surgical device (10), wherein the second distal linkage (408) is directly engaged with the second articulation member (384). With regard to claim 17, Beardsley discloses an articulation assembly for use with a surgical device (10), wherein the second distal linkage (408) is fixed from longitudinal movement relative to the second articulation member (384). With regard to claim 18, Beardsley discloses a surgical device (10), comprising: an end effector (600) including a surgical tool (610, 620); an outer tube (200) having a distal end, the end effector pivotably connected to the distal end of the outer tube (200); and an articulation assembly (300) including: a first articulation member (406) disposed in mechanical cooperation with the end effector assembly (600); a second articulation member (408) disposed in mechanical cooperation with the end effector assembly (600); a first spring-loaded articulation mechanism (340) disposed in mechanical cooperation with the first articulation member (406), the first spring-loaded articulation mechanism including a first distal linkage (406), a first stop member (end of bas passage 316), and a first biasing member (338), the first biasing member disposed between the first distal linkage (406) and the first stop member (end of bas passage 316); and a second spring-loaded articulation mechanism (340) disposed in mechanical cooperation with the second articulation member (384), the second spring-loaded articulation mechanism (340) including a second distal linkage (408), a second stop member (end of bas passage 316), and a second biasing member (408), the second biasing member disposed between the second distal linkage (408) and the second stop member (end of bas passage 316), wherein distal movement of the first articulation member (360) relative to the first stop member (end of bas passage 316) results in the first biasing member (338) moving toward an expanded orientation. With regard to claim 19, Beardsley discloses a surgical device (10), comprising: an end effector (600) including a surgical tool (610, 620), wherein proximal movement of the second articulation member relative to the second stop member (end of bas passage 316) results in the second biasing member (338) moving toward a compressed orientation. With regard to claim 20, Beardsley discloses a surgical device (10), comprising: an end effector (600) including a surgical tool (610, 620), wherein the first biasing member (338) is configured to move toward the expanded orientation at the same time as the second biasing member (338) moves toward the compressed orientation. REASONS FOR ALLOWANCE Claims 1-10 are allowed over the prior art of record. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: With regard to claim 1, Beardsley discloses an articulation assembly for use with a surgical device, the articulation assembly comprising: a first articulation member disposed in mechanical cooperation with an end effector assembly of the surgical device; a second articulation member disposed in mechanical cooperation with the end effector assembly of the surgical device; a first spring-loaded articulation mechanism disposed in mechanical cooperation with the first articulation member and with the second articulation member, the first spring-loaded articulation mechanism including a proximal boss, a distal boss, and a first biasing member extending between the proximal boss and the distal boss; and a second spring-loaded articulation mechanism disposed in mechanical cooperation with the first articulation member and with the second articulation member, the second spring-loaded articulation mechanism including a proximal boss, a distal boss, and a second biasing member extending between the proximal boss and the distal boss, wherein distal movement of the first articulation member relative to the second articulation member results in compression of the first biasing member and compression of the second biasing member. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Refer to attachment for notice of references cited and recommended for consideration based on their disclosure of limitations of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANIEL C. CHUKWURAH whose telephone number is (571)272-4457. The examiner can normally be reached M-F & T-F 7-4:30 IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at 571-260-1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANIEL C CHUKWURAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731 7/28/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771212
POWER TOOL INCLUDING A PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD WITH A HIGH IMPEDANCE TRACE
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759127
POWER TOOL WITH TORQUE CONTROLLING ACCESSORY
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759186
ENERGY STORAGE MECHANISM AND NAIL GUN HAVING SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758243
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758221
SURGICAL STAPLE CARTRIDGE FOR SUPPORTING SURGICAL BUTTRESS MATERIAL
1y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.9%)
2y 9m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1485 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month