Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 19/479,498

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODING FOR EFFICIENT TRANSMISSION OF GEOMETRIC PARTITIONING INFORMATION

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Priority
May 16, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0062811 +2 more
Examiner
NOH, JAE NAM
Art Unit
2481
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Kwangwoon University Industry-Academic Collaboration Foundation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
414 granted / 479 resolved
+28.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -9% lift
Without
With
+-9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
508
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 479 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to the application filed on 10/28/2025. Claims 1-18 are pending. Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority. All of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The references listed on the Information Disclosure Statement submitted on 10/28/2025 has/have been considered by the examiner (see attached PTO-1449). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the claim 18 is not clearly limited to the non-transitory medium. The specification also does not clearly define the claimed "computer-readable recording medium" as being limited to a non-transitory medium. Bitstream Claim interpretation Claim 18 is directed to a computer readable medium that stores generated bitstream. The bitstream is being treated as a product that is the result of the process (method). The steps are not required elements of claim 18, so they only limit the invention in terms of how they define the contents of the information in the bitstream. MPEP §2113 The contents of the bitstream, defined by how the bitstream was generated, only describes the content of the information in the bitstream and as result are descriptive language. See MPEP §2111.05. The bitstream has no functional relationship with the claimed non-transitory computer-readable recording medium. Claim Mapping Notation In this office action, following notations are being used to refer to the paragraph numbers or column number and lines of portions of the cited reference. In this office action, following notations are being used to refer to the paragraph numbers or column number and lines of portions of the cited reference. [0005] (Paragraph number [0005]) C5 (Column 5) Pa5 (Page 5) S5 (Section 5) Furthermore, unless necessary to distinguish from other references in this action, “et al.” will be omitted when referring to the reference. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) and (a2) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 20120008676 A1). A computer-readable recording medium storing a bitstream generated by a video encoding method, wherein the video encoding method comprises:determining high level information related to applying a geometric partitioning mode;generating partitioning boundary information of a current block based on the high level information;generating partitioned blocks of the current block based on the partitioning boundary information;determining whether there is a neighboring block reconstructed according to the geometric partitioning mode; anddetermining whether, at a block boundary between the neighboring block and thecurrent block, there is a contact point due to a partitioning boundary of neighboring blocks,wherein the video encoding method further comprises, when there is at least one or more of the contact point: generating a partitioned boundary predictor of the current block by using partitioning boundary information of the neighboring block; and generating difference information by subtracting the partitioned boundary predictor from the partitioning boundary information of the current block. “[0177] Partitions having geometric shapes may not be merged with neighboring data units contacting upper boundaries and left boundaries of the partitions according to positions and shapes of the partitions. For example, from among two partitions 149 and 150 of the prediction unit 148, the partition 150 may be merged with a neighboring data unit 151 contacting a left boundary. However, since a neighboring data unit contacting an upper boundary is the partition 149 included in the same prediction unit 158, the partition 150 may not be merged with the upper neighboring data unit. In this case, merging index information of the partition 150 may not include an index indicating the partition 149 that is the upper neighboring data unit.” “[0377] One or more exemplary embodiments may be written as computer programs and may be implemented in general-use digital computers that execute the programs using a computer readable recording medium. Examples of the computer readable recording medium include magnetic storage media (e.g., ROM, floppy disks, hard disks, etc.) and optical recording media (e.g., CD-ROMs, or DVDs).” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-17 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sim et al. (US 20230179762 A1) and Yin et al. (US 20260281362 A1) disclose relevant art related to the subject matter of the present invention. A shortened statutory period for reply to this action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. An extension of time may be obtained under 37 CFR 1.136(a). However, in no event, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAE N NOH whose telephone number is (571)270-0686. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 8:30AM-5PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Vaughn can be reached on (571) 272-3922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAE N NOH/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2481
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12754293
SEPARATED TYPE RECEIVING DEVICE FOR LIDAR, TRANSMITTING DEVICE FOR LIDAR AND LIDAR SYSTEM THEREOF
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750506
BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT LAYERED VIDEO CODING
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739386
A METHOD, AN APPARATUS AND A COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR ENCODING AND DECODING OF DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739504
IN-VEHICLE APPARATUS
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737925
THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA ENCODING METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA DECODING METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA ENCODING DEVICE, AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA DECODING DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (-9.4%)
2y 3m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 479 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month