Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/481,974

LED MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Priority
May 08, 2023 — EU 23171975.8 +1 more
Examiner
EIDE, ERIC T
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Signify Holding B.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
299 granted / 446 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
479
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 446 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Preliminary amendments The preliminary amendment filed 11/06/2025 has been entered. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/06/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7, 11, and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park (US 2010/0103651). Regarding claim 1, Park discloses a light emitting diode, LED, module (25 and 27, Fig. 2) comprising a printed circuit board, PCB (111, Fig. 4), on which PCB at least one LED (113, Fig. 4, Paragraph 0028) is arranged, where: the PCB comprises a first mechanical and electrical interface (convex part 117 with conductive sidewall, Fig. 4, Paragraph 0026, 0031) arranged at a first end of the PCB (side surface of 111, Fig. 4) and a second mechanical and electrical interface (concave part 127 with conductive sidewall, Fig. 4, Paragraph 0026, 0031) arranged at a second end of the PCB (side surface of 121, and of 151 at 155, Fig. 4 and 5), the first mechanical and electrical interface comprises a convex edge (117, Fig. 4, specifically a press-fit convex part rather than a concentric rotatable edge of a defined curvature radius) of the first end of the PCB having a first curvature radius, the second mechanical and electrical interface comprises, at the second end of the PCB, a concave edge (127, Fig. 4, specifically a press-fit concave part that receives 117) having at most the first curvature radius, the concave edge being configured to receive a convex edge of a first mechanical and electrical interface of another LED module (Paragraph 0026, 0029), and said at least one LED is arranged in electrical connection with the first mechanical and electrical interface and in electrical connection with the second mechanical and electrical interface (113 and 123 tied through conductive layers on the wall surfaces of 117 and 127, Fig. 4, Paragraph 0028, 0031), wherein the first mechanical and electrical interface comprises at least a first connection strip (one of 117, Fig. 4) extending from the first end of the PCB, and the second mechanical and electrical interface comprises an arc-shaped slot (the void of one of 127 that corresponds to the one of 117 above, Fig. 4) in the PCB that is concentric with the concave edge of the second end of the PCB (Fig. 4), the arc-shaped slot having a curvature radius that is greater than the first curvature radius and configured to receive at least a first connection strip of said first mechanical and electrical interface of said another LED module (Paragraph 0029, Specifically the concave/convex shapes may be realized to coupled each other by press-fitting a convex part 127 into a concave part 117; the arc of 127 would need to be less than that of 117 in order for them to be press-fit together). Regarding claim 2, Park discloses the first end of the PCB and the second end of the PCB are opposite ends of the PCB (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 3, Park discloses the at least first connection strip comprises a resilient bulge fitting into the arc-shaped slot (Paragraph 0029). Regarding claim 4, Park discloses the bulge is configured in the form of metal sheet material and shaped according to one of a flat bottom U shape, a U-shape, or an O-shape (Fig. 4, Paragraph 0027). Regarding claim 5, Park discloses the at least first connection strip is an electrically conducting connection strip (Paragraphs 0027 and 0031), the arc-shaped slot comprises at least a first electrical contact surface (Paragraph 0031), the arc-shaped slot being configured to receive said at least first electrically conducting connection strip of said another LED module such that said at least first electrical contact surface connect with said at least first electrically conducting connection strip (Paragraph 0027-0031 and Fig. 4). Regarding claim 6, Park discloses the convex edge of the first end of the PCB comprises at least a first convex electrical contact surface (one of 117, Fig. 4), the concave edge of the second end of the PCB comprises at least a first concave electrical contact surface (one of 127 that corresponds to the one of 117, Fig. 4), where said at least first convex electrical contact surface being configured to electrically connect with said at least first concave electrical contact surface of said another LED module (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 7, Park discloses the convex edge of the first end of the PCB comprises a first convex electrical contact surface (the curved surface of 117, Fig. 4), the concave edge of the second end of the PCB comprises a first concave electrical contact surface (the concave section of 127, Fig. 4), said first convex electrical contact surface being configured to electrically connect with said first concave electrical contact surface of said another LED module (Paragraph 0031), the at least first connection strip is an electrically conducting connection strip (Paragraph 0031), the arc-shaped slot comprises a first electrical contact surface, the arc-shaped slot being configured to receive said first electrically conducting connection strip of said another LED module such that said first electrical contact surface connect with said first electrically conducting connection strip (fig. 4). Regarding claim 11, Park discloses a system comprising a plurality of LED modules according to claim 1 (Fig. 4 and 5). Regarding claim 12, Park discloses A luminaire (Figs. 3 and 4) comprising a system of LED modules according to claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art taken as a whole does not show nor suggest all of the limitations of claim 8 as specifically called for the claimed combinations. The closest prior art, Park (US 2010/0103651) teaches several limitations and their specifics as rejected in the office action above. However Park fails to disclose a second connection strip extending from the first end of the pcb, where the first connection strip is arranged on the front side of the OCB and the second connection strip is arranged on a backside of the pcb the arc-shaped slot is configured to receive the second connection strip of said another LED module as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant' s own disclosure, to modify the Park reference in the manner required by the claims. Relevant Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Watanabe (US 2010/0073931) teaches a pcb with LEDs being connected at its ends. Pearson et al. (US 2013/0272000) and Pearson et al. (US 2016/0298832) teach a lighting module connecting to other lighting modules. Cho et al. (US 7371071) teaches PCBs that are snapfit connected. Isoda teaches a protrusion and a recess connecting two lighting modules with connections. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC T EIDE whose telephone number is (571)272-7405. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jong-Suk (James) Lee can be reached at (571)272-7044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC T EIDE/ Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768512
HIGH CONSPICUITY MULTI-AXIS LIGHTING FOR EMERGENCY AND UTILITY VEHICLES
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768529
WATERPROOF LAMP
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760869
Light Fixture With Removably Mountable Sensor Assembly
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760856
LIGHTING DEVICE FOR VEHICLES
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12692996
VEHICLE LAMP AND VEHICLE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+21.9%)
2y 1m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 446 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month