Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/484,417

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Priority
May 19, 2023 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2023018748
Examiner
ELAHI, TOWFIQ
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sharp Display Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
593 granted / 744 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
771
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
66.6%
+26.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 744 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 8, 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bae (US 20120212401) in view of Kim (US 20200342806). Regarding claim 1 Bae teaches a display device (fig.1), comprising: a clock signal output circuit (fig.2A, 210, SC1): a plurality of clock signal lines (CLK1, CLK2); a driver circuit including a shift register and electrically connected to the plurality of clock signal lines (fig. 2A, CK1, Ck2); a plurality of pixel circuits (fig. 1, [0046] [0047]); and at least one of a first time-constant circuit (fig.1, 431, [0053]) connected between the clock signal output circuit (fig.1, 210, 230) and the plurality of clock signal lines (fig.1, clk1, clk2, clk3, clk4 ) or a second time-constant circuit connected between the driver circuit and the plurality of pixel circuits; Bae is silent on a touch sensor layer including: a sensor electrode group; and a routed wire group electrically connected to the sensor electrode group, wherein the touch sensor layer includes a routing region in which the routed wire group is formed, and in a plan view, the routing region overlaps with the plurality of clock signal lines. However, Kim teaches a touch sensor layer including: a sensor electrode group (fig.8, TE-1-1, TE2); and a routed wire group (fig. 8, TL1, TL2) electrically connected to the sensor electrode group, wherein the touch sensor layer includes a routing region (fig. 9 TL region) in which the routed wire group is formed, and in a plan view (fig. 8, fig. 9), the routing region (fig. 9, TL) overlaps with the plurality of clock signal lines (fig. 9, first clock signal line CL1, the second clock signal line CL2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art to combine Bae in light of Kim teaching so that it may include a touch sensor layer including: a sensor electrode group; and a routed wire group electrically connected to the sensor electrode group, wherein the touch sensor layer includes a routing region in which the routed wire group is formed, and in a plan view, the routing region overlaps with the plurality of clock signal lines. The motivation is to provide display devices are provided with an input sensing layer as an input device that facilitates intuitive interface, space-saving design and faster task execution. Claim 2 is canceled. Regarding claim 3 Bae teaches wherein the first time-constant circuit (fig. 1, 431) distorts waveforms (fig. 2A) of a plurality of clock signals (fig. 3) to be input from the clock signal output circuit (fig.1, 210, 230). Regarding claim 4 Bae teaches wherein the second time-constant circuit (fig. 1, 432) distorts waveforms (fig. 2B) of a plurality of clock signals (fig. 3) to be input from the clock signal output circuit (fig.1, 210, 230). Regarding claim 5 Bae teaches further comprising a plurality of scan signal lines, wherein the driver circuit outputs a drive signal to each of the plurality of scan signal lines (fig. 2, see 230, GLi, GLj). Claims 6-7 canceled. Regarding claim 8 Bae teaches wherein each of the plurality of clock signal lines is supplied with a clock signal, and each of a rise period and a fall period of the clock signal (fig. 4, CK1 to CK4 got rise and fall time). While Bae does not expressly teach each of a rise period and a fall period of the clock signal is 1.5 micro-second or longer. However, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to implement each of a rise period and a fall period of the clock signal is 1.5 micro-second or longer since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Regarding claim 28 Bae in view of Kim teach further comprising: a touch sensor layer including a sensor electrode group (Kim: fig.8, TE-1-1, TE2) and a routed wire group (Kim: fig. 8, TL1, TL2) electrically connected to the sensor electrode group (Kim: fig. 8, fig. 9); a first clock signal line that transmits the first clock signal; and a second clock signal line that transmits the second clock signal (fig.1), wherein the touch sensor layer includes a routing region in which the routed wire group is formed, and in a plan view, the routing region overlaps with the first clock signal line and the second clock signal line (Kim: fig. 9, first clock signal line CL1, the second clock signal line CL2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 10-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim (US 20200342806). Regarding claim 10 Bae teaches a display device (fig. 1), comprising: a first driver (fig.1, 210) configured to receive a first clock signal and a second clock signal (fig. 1, CK1, CK2) and to generate a scan signal (GLi), a second driver (fig.1, 230) configured to receive a third clock signal and a fourth clock signal (fig. 1, CK3, CK4) and to generate a discharge control signal (fig. 8, ), and a pixel circuit configured to receive the scan signal and the discharge control signal ([0106] The first discharging circuit 241 is in a second peripheral area PA2. The first discharging circuit 241 is electrically connected to a second end of the gate lines GLi-1 and Gli opposite to the first end, and discharges a high voltage VON of the gate signal applied to each gate line GLi-1 or GLi to a low voltage VOFF The first discharging circuit 241 includes a first discharging transistor TR1 and a voltage line VL transmitting the low voltage VOFF. As shown in FIG. 8, the first discharging transistor TR1 is in the second peripheral area PA2 between the stages SCj-1 and SCj-2 and is in the second peripheral area PA2 corresponding to (e.g., not exceeding) a width of the pixel row defined by a distance between the (i-1)-th and (j-1)-th gate lines GLi-1 and GLj-1), wherein a rise timing of the first clock signal is different from rise timings of the third clock signal and the fourth clock signal (fig, 3, CK1 rise time different from rise timings CK3 and CK4). Regarding claim 11 Bae teaches wherein fall timing of the first clock signal (fig. 3, CK1) is different from fall timings of the third clock signal (fig.1, CK3) and the fourth clock signal (fig.1, CK4). Regarding claim 12 Bae teaches wherein a rise timing of the second clock signal (fig. 3, CK2) is different from rise timings of the third clock signal (fig.1, CK3) and the fourth clock signal (fig.1, CK4). Regarding claim 13 Bae teaches wherein a fall timing of the second clock signal (fig. 3, CK2) is different from fall timings of the third clock signal (fig. 3, CK3) and the fourth clock signal (fig. 3, CK4). Regarding claim 14 Bae teaches wherein an active period of the third clock signal includes an active period of the first clock signal (fig. 3). Regarding claim 15 Bae teaches wherein an active period of the fourth clock signal includes an active period of the second clock signal (fig. 3). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 20-22, 24, 26 allowed. As none of the prior art teaches “wherein a rise period of the fifth clock signal overlaps with a fall period of at least one of the second clock signal or the fourth clock signal.: Claims 9, 16, 17 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. -Chung US 20070063933 teaches some aspect of independent claim. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOWFIQ ELAHI whose telephone number is (571)270-1687. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 10AM-3PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached at (571)272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOWFIQ ELAHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761490
Device with a Removable Cushion
1y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12749429
SYSTEMS, METHODS AND DEVICES FOR PROVIDING SEQUENCE BASED DISPLAY DRIVERS
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12737005
FLEXIBLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY OF APPLICATION EXECUTION SCREEN
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724581
IMPLEMENTING SEAMLESS INTERACTIONS ACROSS EXTENDED REALITY (XR) AND NON-XR PLATFORMS
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725348
CONTROL APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 5m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 744 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month