Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/565,216

BOXING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Priority
Mar 19, 2025 — JP 2025-044429
Examiner
HODGE, LINDA J
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ishida Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
217 granted / 248 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
287
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.4%
-0.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 248 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgement is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement Receipt is acknowledged of Information Disclosure Statements (IDS), filed 12 March 2026 and 25 August 2026, which have been placed of record in the file. An initialed, signed, and dated copy of each PTO-1449 or PTO-SB-08 form is attached to the Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 is ambiguous as the phrase “0⁰ being defined as a time when the suction unit starts the suction” is unclear since a measurement of an angle is not a time. For examination purposes, this phrase is interpreted as ““0⁰ being defined at a time when the suction unit starts the suction”. Clarification and/or correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shitamae et al. (JP 6059478), cited by applicant. With respect to claim 1, Shitamae et al. disclose a boxing apparatus comprising: a pushing mechanism configured to push an article into a box having an opening facing sideways from a lateral side (pushing member 41 pushes article A into sideways facing opening in cardboard box C, fig. 8C); and a posture changing mechanism configured to rotate the box by a first angle so as to change a posture of the box accommodating the article from a state where the opening faces sideways to a state where the opening faces upward (posture changing unit 50 that rotates cardboard box C by a first angle, figs. 8G-H), wherein the posture changing mechanism comprises: a suction unit configured to suction, from below, a suctioned side surface that is a side surface of the box located on a lower side of the box when the article is pushed in by the pushing mechanism (suction unit 51, figs. 8G); a support unit configured to support the suction unit (support unit 57, fig. 6); and a rotation unit configured to rotate the support unit by the first angle around a rotation axis parallel to a boundary line between the suctioned side surface and the opening (rotation unit 59 that rotates the support unit 57 by the first angle, figs. 59, 8G-H), wherein the suction unit: starts suction in a state where the posture of the box is such that the opening faces sideways (suction unit 51 sucks the side surface of the cardboard box C until the article A is pushed into the cardboard box C); and reduces a suction force or stops suction when the rotation unit rotates the support unit by a second angle that is less than the first angle, with reference to a time when the suction is started. Shitamae et al. disclose the suction unit and a control unit 80. Thus, one is fully capable of operating the suction unit such that the suction unit “reduces a suction force or stops suction when the rotation unit rotates the support unit by a second angle that is less than the first angle, with reference to a time when the suction is started”. The intended use recitation language (some of which has been italicized supra) carries no weight in the absence of any distinguishing structure. Shitamae et al. disclose the structure as claimed and is thus capable of performing the functions. See MPEP 2114 which states: APPARATUS CLAIMS MUST BE STRUCTURALLY DISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE PRIOR ART While features of an apparatus may be recited either structurally or functionally, claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431-32 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (The absence of a disclosure in a prior art reference relating to function did not defeat the Board's finding of anticipation of claimed apparatus because the limitations at issue were found to be inherent in the prior art reference); see also In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 210,212-13, 169 USPQ 226,228-29 (CCPA 1971); In re Danly, 263 F.2d 844, 847, 120 USPQ 528,531 (CCPA 1959). "[A]pparatus claims cover what a device is, not what a device does." Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc., 909 F.2d 1464, 1469, 15 USPQ2d 1525, 1528 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (emphasis in original). With respect to claim 2, Shitamae et al. disclose a control unit configured to control a rotation speed of the rotation unit based on an angle of the rotation unit (control device 80), wherein the control unit starts decreasing the rotation speed of the rotation unit when the angle of the rotation unit reaches a third angle that is less than the second angle (the control unit decelerates and temporarily stops rotation at the angle R1, pg. 13, Modification A, fig. 8G). With respect to claim 3, Shitamae et al. disclose the first angle is 90° (figs. 8G-H), and wherein the second angle is 45° or more and less than 90° (angle R1 is 45⁰ or less, pg. 13, (4-9), with 0° being defined as a time when the suction unit starts the suction (fig. 8F). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Serra (US Patent No. 6,266,948) and Fioravanti et al. (US Patent Publ. No. 2025/0128845) disclose a box opening apparatus including deactivating box opening suction cups. Dong et al. (CN 117104616) disclose a box opening device including deactivating suction cups to permit a box to fall. Weber (US Patent No. 3,134,309) disclose deactivating suction cups. Cloud et al. (US Patent No. 3,854,270) disclose a box erecting apparatus including freeing a carton to prevent damage to the carton. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Linda J. Hodge whose telephone number is (571)272-0571. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shelley Self can be reached at (571) 272-4524. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LINDA J. HODGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2026
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749583
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MACHINE LEARNING CONTROL OF A SURGICAL DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746003
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH ADJUSTABLE JAWS
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741841
TRANSPORT APPARATUS FOR SUPPLY ROLLS WITH PACKAGING MATERIAL WOUND THEREON
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741362
POWER TOOL HAVING MULTIPLE OPERATING MODES
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733930
SURGICAL STAPLING INSTRUMENT
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.3%)
2y 1m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 248 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month