Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/566,503

INTERACTION CONTROL METHOD, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Priority
Mar 13, 2025 — CN 202510300592.7
Examiner
AMADIZ, RODNEY
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
523 granted / 656 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
668
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 656 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on April 10, 2026 and July 9, 2026 have been considered by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 9-11, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Holz (WO 2014/113507—hereinafter “Holz”). Claims 1, 11 and 20 are drawn to an interaction control method, an electronic device and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, respectively. Claims 1, 11 and 20 recite the same invention in different statutory formats and thus are considered together below. As to Claims 11, 1 and 20, Holz teaches an electronic device (Fig. 1B at 100B), comprising: at least one processor (Fig. 1B at 132); and at least one memory (Fig. 1B at 134), configured to store an executable instruction of the at least one processor (Pg. 31, ¶ 108, Pg. 32, ¶’s 110 and 113, Pg. 33, ¶ 119, Pg. 34, ¶ 123, Pg. 35, ¶’s 125 and 129), wherein the at least one processor is configured to execute an interaction control method (Pg. 31, ¶ 108, Pg. 32, ¶’s 110 and 113, Pg. 33, ¶ 119, Pg. 34, ¶ 123, Pg. 35, ¶’s 125 and 129), and the method comprises: acquiring first finger motion information of a user, the first finger motion information comprising at least one selected from a group consisting of a motion speed of a finger and a displacement of the finger (Fig. 3C at 354, 356, 358 and 362); determining first state change information of a first object according to the first finger motion information (Fig. 3C at 364 and Fig. 4A and Pg. 18, ¶’s 64-65); and adjusting a state of the first object according to the first state change information (Fig. 3C at 364 and Fig. 4A and Pgs. 22-23, ¶ 76-79 and Pg. 18, ¶’s 64-65), wherein different finger motion information corresponds to different state change information (Fig. 3C at 364 and Fig. 4A and Pg. 18, ¶’s 64-65). As to Claims 9 and 19, Holz teaches that the first state change information comprises at least one of followings: change information of a position wherein the first object is located, color change information, shape change information, or sound change information (See Fig. 4A and Pg. 18, ¶’s 64-65). As to Claim10, Holz teaches that before determining the first state change information of the first object according to the first finger motion information, the method further comprises: acquiring a first motion state of a hand of the user, the first motion state representing that the hand of the user stops moving or continues moving, wherein determining the first state change information of the first object according to the first finger motion information comprises: determining a finger motion variation of the first finger motion information relative to finger motion information at a previous moment in response to the first motion state representing that the hand of the user continues moving, and determining a state variation corresponding to the finger motion variation as the first state change information; or, determining the finger motion variation of the first finger motion information relative to the finger motion information at the previous moment in response to the first motion state representing that the hand of the user stops moving, determining state change speed decreasing information of the first object, and determining the first state change information according to the state change speed decreasing information and the state variation corresponding to the finger motion variation (See Figs. 8A-8C and Pgs. 28-30, ¶’s 97-102). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8 and 12-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Kutliroff et al. U.S. Patent 9,910,498 Sawaki USPGPUB 2018/0348986 Sawhney et al. USPGPUB 2020/0311397 Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY AMADIZ whose telephone number is (571)272-7762. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Thurs; 9AM - 5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at 571-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RODNEY AMADIZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2026
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12755713
DISPLAY PANEL AND COMPENSATION METHOD OF SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12754624
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12754643
SENSOR CONTROLLER, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD OF SENSOR CONTROLLER
1y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12738250
DISPLAY DEVICE, MANUFCTURING METHOD THEREOF, DRIVING METHOD THEREOF, AND ELECRONIC DEVICE USING THE DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726561
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING FLEXIBLE DISPLAY, OPERATING METHOD THEREOF, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 4m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 656 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month