Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 19/571,968

ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR HAVING A SOLE PLATE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Priority
Jan 20, 2021 — provisional 63/139,447 +3 more
Examiner
DENKOVIC, HALEY
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Puma SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
136 granted / 240 resolved
-13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +59% interview lift
Without
With
+58.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
282
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.2%
+7.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 240 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 17 in the reply filed on 08/31/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-20 read on the elected embodiment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-9, and 11-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Chen et al. (US 2021/0085024). Regarding Claim 1, Chen et al. teaches a sole structure (200) for an article of footwear (10) having an upper (100) (Fig. 1 shows the sole structure (200) being used in an article of footwear (10) with an upper (100)), the sole structure defining a lateral side (18), a medial side (16), a forefoot region (20), a midfoot region (22), a heel region (24), a toe end (12), a heel end (14), and a longitudinal axis (A10) extending between the toe end and the heel end (figs. 2A and 3A show the sole structure having each of the sides, regions, and ends as claimed), comprising: an outsole (204) having an upper outsole (210) and a lower outsole (212, 214) that is directly coupled with the upper outsole (figs. 2A and 4 show the upper (210) and lower (2112, 214) outsoles being directly coupled with each other), the upper outsole defining a front portion within the forefoot region, a middle portion within the midfoot region, and a rear portion within the heel region (figs. 2A and 3A show the upper outsole (210) extending through and defining front, middle, and rear portions in the forefoot, midfoot, and heel regions); and a front cushioning member disposed within a front spacing (see annotated Fig.) between the upper outsole and the lower outsole (annotated fig. 4 shows the front spacing, and while the front cushioning member is not shown, paragraph [042] teaches “the central portions 244a-244d may be spaced from the chassis 210 by any suitable element, such as, for example, a foam member, a fluid-filled chamber, etc,” wherein the foam member is considered to be the front cushioning member as the front spacing is formed between the central portion (244) and the upper outsole (210)), wherein the lower outsole extends outward from a periphery of the upper outsole, away from the longitudinal axis, and wherein the lower outsole curves downward and inward, toward the longitudinal axis, to extend beneath the upper outsole to form the front spacing therebetween (fig. 4 shows the lower outsole (212, 214) extending from a periphery of the upper outsole outward and away from the longitudinal axis and curving downwards and inward toward the longitudinal axis to extend under the upper outsole and form the front spacing therebetween). Regarding Claim 2, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 1, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein the upper outsole (210) defines a heelmost end of the outsole (fig. 3B shows the upper outsole (210) defining a heelmost end of the outsole (204)). Regarding Claim 3, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 1, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein the lower outsole (212, 214) is configured to partially collapse into the front cushioning member (fig. 7 shows the lower outsole (212, 214) configured to collapse into the front spacing, therein the lower outsole (212, 214) would clearly partially collapse into the front cushioning member when it is disposed in the front spacing in the manner as describe above). Regarding Claim 4, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 1, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein a plurality of first ground engaging members (246, 248) extends from a bottom surface of the lower outsole (212, 214) (fig. 3A shows the first ground engaging members (246, 248) extending from a bottom surface of the lower outsole (212, 214). Regarding Claim 5, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 1, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein the plurality of first ground engaging members (246, 248) is disposed directly below the front cushioning member (as the front cushioning member/foam member is taught (see paragraph [0042] cited above) as being disposed between the central portion (244) of the lower outsole (212, 214), and fig. 4 shows the plurality of first ground engaging members (246, 248) being disposed directly below the central portion (244), the plurality of front ground engaging members would clearly be disposed directly below the front cushioning member). Regarding Claim 7, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 1, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein the front spacing (see annotated Fig.) defines a curved length extending in a direction between the heel end and the toe end of the sole structure (annotated fig. 2B shows the front spacing defining a curved length extending in a direction between the heel (14) and the toe (12) ends of the sole structure). Regarding Claim 8, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 1, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein the lower outsole (212, 214) does not extend to the heel end of the sole structure (figs. 2A and 2B show the lower outsole (212, 214) not extending to the heel end (14) of the sole structure). Regarding Claim 9, Chen et al. teaches a sole structure (200) for an article of footwear (10) having an upper (100) (Fig. 1 shows the sole structure (200) being used in an article of footwear (10) with an upper (100)), the sole structure defining a lateral side (18), a medial side (16), a forefoot region (20), a midfoot region (22), a heel region (24), a toe end (12), a heel end (14), and a longitudinal axis (A10) extending between the toe end and the heel end (figs. 2A and 3A show the sole structure having each of the sides, regions, and ends as claimed), comprising: an outsole (204) having an upper outsole (210) and a lower outsole (212, 214) that is directly coupled with the upper outsole (figs. 2A and 4 show the upper (210) and lower (2112, 214) outsoles being directly coupled with each other), the upper outsole defining a front portion within the forefoot region, a middle portion within the midfoot region, and a rear portion within the heel region (figs. 2A and 3A show the upper outsole (210) extending through and defining front, middle, and rear portions in the forefoot, midfoot, and heel regions); and a front cushioning member disposed within a front spacing (see annotated Fig.) between the upper outsole and the lower outsole (annotated fig. 4 shows the front spacing, and while the front cushioning member is not shown, paragraph [042] teaches “the central portions 244a-244d may be spaced from the chassis 210 by any suitable element, such as, for example, a foam member, a fluid-filled chamber, etc,” wherein the foam member is considered to be the front cushioning member as the front spacing is formed between the central portion (244) and the upper outsole (210)), wherein the lower outsole extends outward from a periphery of the upper outsole, away from the longitudinal axis, and wherein the lower outsole curves downward and inward, toward the longitudinal axis, to extend beneath the upper outsole to form the front spacing therebetween (fig. 4 shows the lower outsole (212, 214) extending from a periphery of the upper outsole outward and away from the longitudinal axis and curving downwards and inward toward the longitudinal axis to extend under the upper outsole and form the front spacing therebetween), wherein the lower outsole defines a ground-engaging surface within the forefoot region, and wherein a plurality of first ground engaging members (246, 248) extends from a bottom surface of the lower outsole (fig. 2A and 3A show the lower outsole (212, 214) defining a ground engaging surface within the forefoot region and a plurality of first ground engaging members (246, 248) extending from a bottom surface of the bottom surface of the lower outsole (212, 214)). Regarding Claim 11, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 9, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein the front spacing (see annotated Fig.) defines a front spacing volume, and wherein the lower outsole is configured to move toward the upper outsole to reduce the front spacing volume and compress the front cushioning member between the lower outsole and the upper outsole (fig. 7 shows the lower outsole (212, 214) being capable of moving toward the upper outsole (210), therein reducing the front spacing volume, where the front cushioning member would also clearly be compressed when present in the manner described in paragraph [0042] above). Regarding Claim 12, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 9, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein the upper outsole (210) defines a heelmost end of the outsole (fig. 3B shows the upper outsole (210) defining a heelmost end of the outsole (204)). Regarding Claim 13, Chen et al. teaches all of the limitations of the sole structure of Claim 9, as discussed in the rejections above. Chen et al. further teaches wherein the outsole (204) comprises a thermoplastic elastomer (paragraph [0031] teaches “The outsole 204 is formed of any suitable material, such as, for example, a foam, a plastic, a thermoplastic polyurethane, a polyvinyl chloride, etc,” wherein thermoplastic polyurethane is a thermoplastic elastomer). PNG media_image1.png 428 854 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 840 858 media_image2.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 14-20 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HALEY A SMITH whose telephone number is (571)272-6597. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khoa Huynh can be reached at (571)272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HALEY A SMITH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2026
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752176
HOCKEY GOALKEEPER LEG PADS
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12745822
Foot Support Systems Including Fluid Movement Controllers and Adjustable Foot Support Pressure
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12727633
TEXTURED GLOVE AND A SYNTHETIC LATEX FORMULATION FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714173
HELMET PAD ASSEMBLY
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702194
SOLE STRUCTURE FOR ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+58.6%)
2y 6m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 240 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month