Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
This application is in response to application filed 04/29/2026 in which the claims 1-7 are pending.
Information Disclosure Statement
The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/17/2026, 04/29/2026, are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner.
Double Patenting
The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b).
The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13.
The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer.
Claims 1-7 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-7 of copending Application No. 19/569,342. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because instant claim 1 is anticipated by the conflicting patented claim 1 as shown in the table below. The difference between the instant examined claim and the conflicting patented claim is that the conflicting patented claim is narrower in scope and falls within the scope of the examined claim This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection.
Co-pending applicaiton:19/569,342
Instant application:19/662,454
1. An image decoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block; obtaining, from a bitstream, rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; and rearranging the sub-regions based on the rearrangement information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions, and wherein the bitstream includes projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system.
1. An image decoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block; obtaining, from a bitstream, rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; and rearranging the sub-regions based on the rearrangement information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions,
and wherein the bitstream includes projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system.
2. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged side-by-bide.
2. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged side-by-bide.
3. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged in a top-bottom.
3. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged in a top-bottom.
4. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating whether flipping is applied to the sub-regions.
4. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating whether flipping is applied to the sub-regions.
5. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating a sub-region to which flipping is applied among the sub-regions.
5. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating a sub-region to which flipping is applied among the sub-regions.
6. An image encoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block based on a prediction block of the current block; encoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block; encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating a bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions.
6. An image encoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block in a picture; encoding the picture
based on the residual block; encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating a bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions.
7. A method for transmitting a bitstream, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block based on a prediction block of the current block; encoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block; encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating the bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information; and transmitting the bitstream, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions.
7. A method for transmitting a bitstream, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block in a picture; encoding the picture based on the residual block; encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in the picture; encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating the bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information; and transmitting the bitstream, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions.
Claims 1-7 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-7 of copending Application No. 19/573,614 in view of Hanhart et al. (US 2019/0200023 A1 ). Although the claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the examined application claim is obvious over the conflicting copending claim
The difference between the instant and conflicting copending claim is the addition of limitation generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions. However Hanhart discloses generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions (Para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the residual transform coefficients are sent to inverse quantization unit 210 and inverse transform unit 212 to reconstruct the residual block, the prediction block and the residual block are then added together at 226, Para[0062] teaches a 360-degree video in equirectangular format is taken as input, and it is desired to convert the input into cubemap format. The following steps are applied: [0063] 1) For each sample position (uc, vc) in cubemap format, calculate the corresponding coordinates (ue, ve) in equirectangular format by the method introduced above. [0064] 2) If the coordinates (ue, ve) in equirectangular thus calculated are not at integer sample position, interpolation filter may be applied to obtain the sample value at this fractional position using samples at its neighboring integer positions.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize limitation in the method of the conflicting patent claim, to obtain reconstructed video block to properly reconstruct the 360-video from the decoded 2D planar video, the geometry and frame packing parameters should be available to the decoder to unpack the data and project it back from the 2D space to the 3D space.
This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection.
Co-pending applicaiton:19/573,614
Instant application:19/662,454
1. An image decoding method, comprising:
obtaining, from a bitstream, rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; and rearranging the sub-regions based on the rearrangement information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions, and wherein the bitstream includes projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system.
1. An image decoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block in a picture from a bitstream; decoding the picture based on the residual block; obtaining, from a bitstream, rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in the decoded picture; and rearranging the sub-regions based on the rearrangement information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions, and wherein the bitstream includes projection information for mapping the decoded picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system.
2. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged side-by-bide.
2. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged side-by-bide.
3. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged in a top-bottom.
3. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged in a top-bottom.
4. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating whether flipping is applied to the sub-regions.
4. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating whether flipping is applied to the sub-regions.
5. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating a sub-region to which flipping is applied among the sub-regions.
5. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating a sub-region to which flipping is applied among the sub-regions.
An image encoding method, comprising:
encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating a bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions,
6. An image encoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block in a picture; encoding the picture based on the residual block;
encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in the picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating a bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions.
A method for transmitting a bitstream, comprising:
encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating the bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information; and transmitting the bitstream, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions.
7. A method for transmitting a bitstream, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block in a picture; encoding the picture based on the residual block;
encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in the picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; generating the bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information; and transmitting the bitstream, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions.
7. Claims 1-7 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 9-15 of copending Application No. 18/771,226 19/573,614 in view of Hanhart et al. (US 2019/0200023 A1 ). Although the claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the examined application claim is obvious over the conflicting copending claim
The difference between the instant and conflicting copending claim is the addition of limitation generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions. However Hanhart discloses generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions (Para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the residual transform coefficients are sent to inverse quantization unit 210 and inverse transform unit 212 to reconstruct the residual block, the prediction block and the residual block are then added together at 226, Para[0062] teaches a 360-degree video in equirectangular format is taken as input, and it is desired to convert the input into cubemap format. The following steps are applied: [0063] 1) For each sample position (uc, vc) in cubemap format, calculate the corresponding coordinates (ue, ve) in equirectangular format by the method introduced above. [0064] 2) If the coordinates (ue, ve) in equirectangular thus calculated are not at integer sample position, interpolation filter may be applied to obtain the sample value at this fractional position using samples at its neighboring integer positions.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize limitation in the method of the conflicting patent claim, to obtain reconstructed video block to properly reconstruct the 360-video from the decoded 2D planar video, the geometry and frame packing parameters should be available to the decoder to unpack the data and project it back from the 2D space to the 3D space.
This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection.
Instant application: 19/662,454
Co-pending application:18/771,226
1. An image decoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block in a picture from a bitstream; decoding the picture based on the residual block; obtaining, from a bitstream, rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; and rearranging the sub-regions based on the rearrangement information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions, and wherein the bitstream includes projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system.
9. An image decoding method, comprising: generating a prediction block by predicting a current block in a picture; decoding the picture based on the prediction block; obtaining, from a bitstream, rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in the decoded picture; and rearranging the sub-regions based on the rearrangement information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions, and wherein the bitstream includes projection information for mapping the decoded picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system.
2. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged side-by-bide.
10. The image decoding method of claim 9, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged side-by-bide.
3. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged in a top-bottom.
11. The image decoding method of claim 9, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged in a top-bottom.
4. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating whether flipping is applied to the sub-regions.
12.The image decoding method of claim 9, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating whether flipping is applied to the sub-regions.
5. The image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating a sub-region to which flipping is applied among the sub-regions.
13.The image decoding method of claim 9, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating a sub-region to which flipping is applied among the sub-regions.
6. An image encoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block in a picture; encoding the picture based on the residual block;
encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating a bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions,.
14. An image encoding method, comprising: generating a prediction block by predicting a current block in a picture; encoding the picture based on the prediction block; encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in the picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating a bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions.
7. A method for transmitting a bitstream, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block in a picture; encoding the picture based on the residual block;
encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; and generating the bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information; and transmitting the bitstream, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions.
15. A method for transmitting a bitstream, comprising: generating a prediction block by predicting a current block in a picture; encoding the picture based on the prediction block;
encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in the picture; encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system; generating the bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information; and transmitting the bitstream, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type and flipping information for the sub-regions.
8. Claims 1-3, 6-7 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-3, 6-7 of copending Application No. 19/630,717 in view of Hanhart et al. (US 2019/0200023 A1). The difference between the instant and 1 conflicting copending claim 1 is the addition of limitation generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions, flipping information for the sub-regions. However Hanhart discloses generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions, flipping information for the sub-regions (Para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the residual transform coefficients are sent to inverse quantization unit 210 and inverse transform unit 212 to reconstruct the residual block, the prediction block and the residual block are then added together at 226, Para[0062] teaches a 360-degree video in equirectangular format is taken as input, and it is desired to convert the input into cubemap format. The following steps are applied: [0063] 1) For each sample position (uc, vc) in cubemap format, calculate the corresponding coordinates (ue, ve) in equirectangular format by the method introduced above. [0064] 2) If the coordinates (ue, ve) in equirectangular thus calculated are not at integer sample position, interpolation filter may be applied to obtain the sample value at this fractional position using samples at its neighboring integer positions. Para[0103] and table 6 teaches face_rotation_idc syntax element Para[0105] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag. Para[0112] & Table teaches rotation may be combined with a vertical flip (or, in some embodiments, a horizontal flip) & Table teaches face_vertical_flip_flag)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize limitation in the method of the conflicting patent claim, to obtain reconstructed video block to properly reconstruct the 360-video from the decoded 2D planar video, the geometry and frame packing parameters should be available to the decoder to unpack the data and project it back from the 2D space to the 3D space.
This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection.
9. Claims 1-3, 6-7 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-3, 6-7 of copending Application No. 19/569,365 in view of Hanhart et al. (US 2019/0200023 A1). Although the claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the examined application claim is obvious over the conflicting copending claim
The difference between the instant and 1 conflicting copending claim 1 is the addition of limitation flipping information for the sub-regions. However Hanhart discloses flipping information for the sub-regions (Para[0103] and table 6 teaches face_rotation_idc syntax element Para[0105] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag. Para[0112] & Table teaches rotation may be combined with a vertical flip (or, in some embodiments, a horizontal flip) & Table teaches face_vertical_flip_flag). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize limitation in the method of the conflicting patent claim, to obtain reconstructed video block to properly reconstruct the 360-video from the decoded 2D planar video, the geometry and frame packing parameters should be available to the decoder to unpack the data and project it back from the 2D space to the 3D space.
This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection.
10. Claims 1-3, 6-7 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-3, 6-7 of copending Application No. 19/631,412 in view of Hanhart et al. (US 2019/0200023 A1). Although the claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the examined application claim is obvious over the conflicting copending claim
The difference between the instant and 1 conflicting copending claim 1 is the addition of limitation generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions, flipping information for the sub-regions. However Hanhart discloses generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream; decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block, and information related to interpolation of the sub-regions, flipping information for the sub-regions (Para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the residual transform coefficients are sent to inverse quantization unit 210 and inverse transform unit 212 to reconstruct the residual block, the prediction block and the residual block are then added together at 226, Para[0062] teaches a 360-degree video in equirectangular format is taken as input, and it is desired to convert the input into cubemap format. The following steps are applied: [0063] 1) For each sample position (uc, vc) in cubemap format, calculate the corresponding coordinates (ue, ve) in equirectangular format by the method introduced above. [0064] 2) If the coordinates (ue, ve) in equirectangular thus calculated are not at integer sample position, interpolation filter may be applied to obtain the sample value at this fractional position using samples at its neighboring integer positions. Para[0103] and table 6 teaches face_rotation_idc syntax element Para[0105] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag. Para[0112] & Table teaches rotation may be combined with a vertical flip (or, in some embodiments, a horizontal flip) & Table teaches face_vertical_flip_flag)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize limitation in the method of the conflicting patent claim, to obtain reconstructed video block to properly reconstruct the 360-video from the decoded 2D planar video, the geometry and frame packing parameters should be available to the decoder to unpack the data and project it back from the 2D space to the 3D space.
This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
11. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
12. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
13. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hanhart et al. (US 2019/0200023 A1).
Regarding claim 1, Hanhart discloses an image decoding method (FIG. 7 illustrates a video decoder), comprising: generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream (Para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the residual transform coefficients are sent to inverse quantization unit 210 and inverse transform unit 212 to reconstruct the residual block); decoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block (para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the prediction block and the residual block are then added together at 226); obtaining, from a bitstream, rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture (Para[0011] teaches syntax elements may be used to specify a projection geometry and/or to specify an arrangement of faces in a frame-packed picture using a grid system. Faces can have different size and/or orientation. In some embodiments, face arrangement on a 2-D plane may have various characteristics, such as constant face width/height along each column/row. 360-Degree Video Property Signaling at Video Level. Para[0077] teaches each picture may be coded in a different projection geometry or with the same geometry but with different face arrangements, sizes, or quality. para[0111] teaches faces may be arranged with different orientations, para0156] teaches FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate exemplary alternative arrangements of faces in a frame-packed picture. FIGS. 14A and 14B each illustrate arrangements of six faces, such as may be used in conjunction with a cubemap projection) ; and rearranging the sub-regions based on the rearrangement information, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions (claim 1 teaches method of decoding 360-degree video encoded in a bitstream, the method comprising: receiving a bitstream encoding a 2D planar video, the bitstream including parameters identifying a projection geometry type having a plurality of faces, the parameters including, for at least one of the faces, an indication of an amount of rotation of the respective face; and mapping the 2D planar video to a 360-degree video using the identified projection geometry format. para[0111] teaches faces may be arranged with different orientations, para0156] teaches FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate exemplary alternative arrangements of faces in a frame-packed picture. FIGS. 14A and 14B each illustrate arrangements of six faces, such as may be used in conjunction with a cubemap projection, Para[0103] and table 6 teaches face_rotation_idc syntax element Para[0105] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag. Para[0112] & Table teaches rotation may be combined with a vertical flip (or, in some embodiments, a horizontal flip) & Table teaches face_vertical_flip_flag), and wherein the bitstream includes projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system (Para[0130] teaches parameters may be used to map a sample from its location in the frame-packed picture to the corresponding location in the 3D geometry. This information may be exploited by advanced 360-video coding to achieve better compression efficiency. For example, the codec may exploit redundant information between neighboring faces in the 3D representation that are not collocated in the frame-packed picture).
Regarding claim 2, Hanhart discloses the image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged side-by-bide (Para[0061] teaches there are different frame packing configurations, such as 3×2 and 4×3. In the 3×2 configuration, the 6 faces are packed into 2 rows, with 3 faces in one row. In the 4×3 configuration, the 4 faces PX, NZ, NX, PZ are packed into one row (e.g., the center row), and the faces PY and NY are separately packed into two different rows (e.g., the top and bottom rows). The example of FIG. 2C makes use of 4×3 frame packing that corresponds to the equirectangular picture in FIG. 1C).
Regarding claim 3, Hanhart discloses the image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangement type includes a type in which the sub-sub-regions are rearranged in a top-bottom (Para[0061] teaches there are different frame packing configurations, such as 3×2 and 4×3. In the 3×2 configuration, the 6 faces are packed into 2 rows, with 3 faces in one row. In the 4×3 configuration, the 4 faces PX, NZ, NX, PZ are packed into one row (e.g., the center row), and the faces PY and NY are separately packed into two different rows (e.g., the top and bottom rows)..
Regarding claim 4, Hanhart discloses the image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating whether flipping is applied to the sub-regions (Para[0105] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag[i][j]: specifies whether the face located at the i-th row and j-th column in the frame packed picture is flipped vertically after rotation & Para[0112] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag[).
Regarding claim 5, Hanhart discloses the image decoding method of claim 1, wherein the flipping information includes information indicating a sub-region to which flipping is applied among the sub-regions (Para[0105] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag[i][j]: specifies whether the face located at the i-th row and j-th column in the frame packed picture is flipped vertically after rotation & Para[0112] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag& Table & Fig. 9C & FIG. 10E: 0° rotation followed by vertical flip; FIG. 10F: 90° rotation followed by vertical flip; FIG. 10G: 180° rotation followed by vertical flip; FIG. 10H: 270° rotation followed by vertical flip).
Regarding claim 6, Hanhart discloses an image encoding method, comprising: generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream (Para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the residual transform coefficients are sent to inverse quantization unit 210 and inverse transform unit 212 to reconstruct the residual block); encoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block (para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the prediction block and the residual block are then added together at 226); encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture (Para[0011] teaches syntax elements may be used to specify a projection geometry and/or to specify an arrangement of faces in a frame-packed picture using a grid system. Faces can have different size and/or orientation. In some embodiments, face arrangement on a 2-D plane may have various characteristics, such as constant face width/height along each column/row. 360-Degree Video Property Signaling at Video Level. Para[0077] teaches each picture may be coded in a different projection geometry or with the same geometry but with different face arrangements, sizes, or quality); encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system (Para[0130] teaches parameters may be used to map a sample from its location in the frame-packed picture to the corresponding location in the 3D geometry. This information may be exploited by advanced 360-video coding to achieve better compression efficiency. For example, the codec may exploit redundant information between neighboring faces in the 3D representation that are not collocated in the frame-packed picture); and generating a bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information (Abstract teaches An encoder selects a projection format and maps the 360-degree video to a 2D planar video using the selected projection format. The encoder encodes the 2D planar video in a bitstream and further signals, in the bitstream, parameters identifying the projection format), wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions, (para[0009] & claim 14 teaches encoding 360-degree video, an encoder selects a projection format, wherein the projection format includes information such as a geometry type and/or geometry orientation. The encoder maps the 360-degree video to a 2D planar video using the selected projection format. The encoder encodes the 2D planar video in a bitstream and further signals, in the bitstream, parameters identifying the projection format. Various geometry types may be used and may be signaled in the bitstream, including equirectangular, cubemap, equal-area, octahedron, icosahedron, cylinder, and user-specified polygon. For geometries types that are associated with a plurality of faces, frame-packing parameters may be signaled to identify the positions and/or orientations of those faces in the 2D planar video. Different faces may be encoded with different sizes and/or different levels of quality. Para[0075], Para[0111] teaches faces may be arranged with different orientations, para0156] teaches FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate exemplary alternative arrangements of faces in a frame-packed picture. FIGS. 14A and 14B each illustrate arrangements of six faces, such as may be used in conjunction with a cubemap projection, Para[0103] and table 6 teaches face_rotation_idc syntax element Para[0105] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag. Para[0112] & Table teaches rotation may be combined with a vertical flip (or, in some embodiments, a horizontal flip) & Table teaches face_vertical_flip_flag).
Regarding claim 7, Hanhart discloses a method for transmitting a bitstream, comprising (Para[0075] teaches 360-degree video coding are addressed by signaling the geometry and frame packing parameters in the bitstream by means of additional high-level syntax elements. In particular, the projection geometry type can be specified, including different parameters for the geometry faces to locate them on the 2D planar video. The 360-video parameters can be signaled at different levels): generating a residual block of a current block from a bitstream (Para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the residual transform coefficients are sent to inverse quantization unit 210 and inverse transform unit 212 to reconstruct the residual block); encoding a picture including the current block based on the residual block (para[0068] & Fig. 7 teaches the prediction block and the residual block are then added together at 226); encoding rearrangement information related to rearranging sub-regions in a picture (Para[0011] teaches syntax elements may be used to specify a projection geometry and/or to specify an arrangement of faces in a frame-packed picture using a grid system. Faces can have different size and/or orientation. In some embodiments, face arrangement on a 2-D plane may have various characteristics, such as constant face width/height along each column/row. 360-Degree Video Property Signaling at Video Level. Para[0077] teaches each picture may be coded in a different projection geometry or with the same geometry but with different face arrangements, sizes, or quality); encoding projection information for mapping the picture to a three-dimensional coordinate system (Para[0130] teaches parameters may be used to map a sample from its location in the frame-packed picture to the corresponding location in the 3D geometry. This information may be exploited by advanced 360-video coding to achieve better compression efficiency. For example, the codec may exploit redundant information between neighboring faces in the 3D representation that are not collocated in the frame-packed picture); and generating the bitstream comprising the rearrangement information and the projection information (Abstract teaches An encoder selects a projection format and maps the 360-degree video to a 2D planar video using the selected projection format. The encoder encodes the 2D planar video in a bitstream and further signals, in the bitstream, parameters identifying the projection format); and transmitting the bitstream, wherein the rearrangement information includes rearrangement type information indicating a rearrangement type, flipping information for the sub-regions(para[0009] & claim 14 teaches encoding 360-degree video, an encoder selects a projection format, wherein the projection format includes information such as a geometry type and/or geometry orientation. The encoder maps the 360-degree video to a 2D planar video using the selected projection format. The encoder encodes the 2D planar video in a bitstream and further signals, in the bitstream, parameters identifying the projection format. Various geometry types may be used and may be signaled in the bitstream, including equirectangular, cubemap, equal-area, octahedron, icosahedron, cylinder, and user-specified polygon. For geometries types that are associated with a plurality of faces, frame-packing parameters may be signaled to identify the positions and/or orientations of those faces in the 2D planar video. Different faces may be encoded with different sizes and/or different levels of quality. Para[0075], Para[0111] teaches faces may be arranged with different orientations, para0156] teaches FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate exemplary alternative arrangements of faces in a frame-packed picture. FIGS. 14A and 14B each illustrate arrangements of six faces, such as may be used in conjunction with a cubemap projection, Para[0103] and table 6 teaches face_rotation_idc syntax element Para[0105] teaches face_vertical_flip_flag. Para[0112] & Table teaches rotation may be combined with a vertical flip (or, in some embodiments, a horizontal flip) & Table teaches face_vertical_flip_flag).
Conclusion
13. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.
Abbas et al. (US 2017/0295356 A1) discloses encoding the image , a facet may be encoded independent from other portions of the image (other facets). The encoded version of the facet may be transformed to obtain transformed portions. The transformation may include rotation, flipping (horizontally or vertically).
14. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROWINA J CATTUNGAL whose telephone number is (571)270-5922. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:30-6pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Pendleton can be reached at (571) 272-7527. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ROWINA J CATTUNGAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2425
Prosecution Insights