Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 30/029,401

TRAP FOR INSECTS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Priority
Nov 23, 2020 — divisional of D969959 +1 more
Examiner
HYDER, PHILIP S
Art Unit
2924
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Rentokil Initial 1927 PLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1127 granted / 1218 resolved
+32.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1224
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
81.4%
+41.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
FINAL REJECTION Reconsideration has been accorded the merits of the claim in view of applicant’s response. While an earnest attempt has been made to address the issues that necessitated the rejection in the prior office action, the response falls short of attaining this goal. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112 is repeated and made final. Claim Rejection; 35 U.S.C. 112 The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) because the application fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. PNG media_image1.png 476 233 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 502 238 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 494 154 media_image3.png Greyscale The description of the location of the boundary on the end remains inconsistent and thus indefinite. Figure 1 shows a broken boundary line inside of the broken line edge, Figs. 3 and 4 show the edge in full lines, and Fig, 7 shows the edge in broken lines. The issue might be that the tapering surface of the exterior is missing from Figs. 6 and 7. Alternately, the tapering surface is shown but the solid line edge is missing from the view. Regardless, Fig. 1 shows a tapering surface, a solid line edge, and a broken line boundary, whereas Figs. 6 and 7 only shows two those of three components. Regardless of which component is missing From Figs. 6 and 7, the end result is the same. The views lack consisstency. Conclusion The claim is finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to Philip Hyder at telephone number 571-272-2621. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to contact the examiner directly, or use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. /Philip S. Hyder/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2924 10/07/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Apr 15, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 17, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 04, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 19, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent RE51080
VIDEO CAMERA
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent RE51064
Combined bird feeder with camera
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent RE50966
CONTROL DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent RE50943
HEADBAND FOR HEADPHONES
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent RE50925
Combined bird feeder with camera
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+3.7%)
1y 8m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month