Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 35/519,571

TUMBLER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 26, 2023
Examiner
ABADIR, NADER
Art Unit
2931
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Stor S L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
98%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 98% — above average
98%
Career Allow Rate
153 granted / 157 resolved
+37.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
2 currently pending
Career history
159
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
62.8%
+22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 157 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . REMARKS Election without Traverse Applicant’s election, without traverse, of Group VII: Embodiment 7 (FIGs. 7.1-7.7) in the reply filed on March 7, 2025, is acknowledged. Groups I-VI and VIII are withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner, 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being for the nonelected designs. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on March 7, 2025. Objection – Title and Specification The title is objected to. The title of a design being claimed must accurately indicate the name of the article claimed. See MPEP § 1503.01. The title referred to in the specification body, “Mug” is inaccurate. The examiner suggests the title of the design applied-for and the title of the design as referred to in the specification body both be amended to “Tumbler” (as in the figure descriptions and claim statement). The title must be amended throughout the application, oath and original declaration excepted. Claim Rejection - 35 U.S.C. §112 (a) & (b) The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a) & (b), as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. FIG. 7.6 is indefinite. In particular, the central area of the bottom, shown in FIG. 7.6, is indefinite. The contours and dimensions of the central area of the bottom are unclear. The inner most claim lines in FIG. 7.6 should be converted to broken line. The lines touching the shading below should be converted to broken line. PNG media_image1.png 280 266 media_image1.png Greyscale A broken line statement should be added. The examiner suggests: “The broken lines depict portions of the Tumbler that form no part of the claimed design.” ________________ When preparing new or replacement drawings, care should be taken to avoid introducing new matter. New matter is prohibited by 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.121(f). Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as amended. If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. If all the figures on a drawing sheet are canceled, a replacement sheet is not required. A marked-up copy of the drawing sheet (labeled as "Annotated Sheet") including an annotation showing that all the figures on that drawing sheet have been canceled must be presented in the amendment or remarks section that explains the change to the drawings. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either "Replacement Sheet" or "New Sheet" pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d) . If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. Conclusion The claim stands rejected under 35 USC §112. The references cited but not applied are considered cumulative art related to the claimed design. A response is required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amendment submitted in response to this Office action must be in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nader Abadir whose telephone number is (571) 272-9118. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rich Edgar can be reached at (571) 272-4816. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call (800) 786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or (571) 272-1000. /N.A./ Examiner, Art Unit 2931 /RICHARD EDGAR/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2931
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 30, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1118260
Drinking glass
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent D1111655
Cookware handle
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent D1108868
Barbecue
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent D1108884
Part of cooking pan
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent D1104594
DOUBLE BURNER STOVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
98%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+2.7%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 157 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month