Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 35/522,548

Shower head

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 03, 2023
Priority
Jul 24, 2023 — IN WIPO135725
Examiner
WILSON, KEITH J
Art Unit
2974
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Gjosa SA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
97%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 97% — above average
97%
Career Allowance Rate
529 granted / 547 resolved
+36.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -0% lift
Without
With
+-0.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
547
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§112
84.4%
+44.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 547 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Detailed Action Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b), first and second paragraphs, as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. The applicants’ drawings are not consistently shown. In fig. 1.1 the interior nozzle portion shows three concentric rings in the center of the nozzle. However, in fig. 1.3 there are several rings concentric rings at the center portion of the nozzle. Because the applicant has not consistently shown the design a person skilled in the art could not make or use the same without resorting to conjecture. Annotated drawings below for context. PNG media_image1.png 466 791 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 587 753 media_image2.png Greyscale To overcome this rejection the applicant must make the drawings in consistent in all views. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as amended. If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. If all the figures on a drawing sheet are canceled, a replacement sheet is not required. A marked-up copy of the drawing sheet (labeled as “Annotated Sheet”) including an annotation showing that all the figures on that drawing sheet have been canceled must be presented in the amendment or remarks section that explains the change to the drawings. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either "Replacement Sheet" or "New Sheet" pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). When preparing new or replacement drawings, be careful to avoid introducing new matter. New matter is prohibited by 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.121(f). Conclusion The claim stands rejected under 35 USC §112. The references cited but not applied are considered cumulative art related to the claimed design. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEITH J WILSON whose telephone number is (571)270-3862. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 am to 630pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dana Weiland can be reached on 571-270-0253. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEITH J WILSON/Examiner, Art Unit 2925
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 03, 2023
Application Filed
May 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 15, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1124240
Shower head
11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent D1120210
Shower head
1y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent D1120211
Snow gun
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent D1109850
Faucet stream straightener
1y 1m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent D1106391
IRRIGATION SPIKE
3y 2m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
97%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (-0.4%)
1y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 547 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month