Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 35/523,392

Handbag

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Examiner
BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE
Art Unit
2913
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Ami Paris
OA Round
2 (Final)
96%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 96% — above average
96%
Career Allow Rate
243 granted / 253 resolved
+36.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-1.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
257
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
72.2%
+32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 253 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
FINAL ACTION General Information The merits of this case have been carefully examined again in light of Applicant's response received 1/26/2026. The rejection of record under 35 USC § 112 (a) and (b) has not been overcome by Applicant's amendment and is hereby repeated and made FINAL. Claim FINAL Rejection – 35 U.S.C. § 112 (a) and (b) The claim is AGAIN and FINALLY rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a) and (b) as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. Applicant did not address all considerations of the first rejection. The claim is indefinite and non-enabling for the following reason/s: The claimed broken lines in replacement figure 1.7 are still shown inconsistently. Based on the descriptive statement in the specification, the Examiner understands that the broken lines illustrate the appearance of claimed seams. Applicant has added new claimed broken lines in figure 1.7 to areas that are not shown with broken lines in figures 1.1-1.5. Specifically, broken lines shown along the bottom back edge of the bag and up the sides to the front that are shown in 1.7 are not shown in 1.1-1.5. Further, the shape and end location of the claimed broken lines along the top edge of the handbag are inconsistent in replacement figure 1.7. It is therefore unclear how replacement figure 1.7 combines with original figures 1.1-1.5 to show one definite claimed appearance. See below: PNG media_image1.png 844 686 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 744 594 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 841 704 media_image3.png Greyscale Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. The references cited but not applied are considered cumulative art related to the claimed design. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Samantha L Brodowski whose telephone number is (571)272-9142. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ian Simmons can be reached at (571) 272-2658. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.L.B./ Examiner, Art Unit 2915 /RICHARD EDGAR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2972
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1115321
Handbag
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent D1115319
Bag
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent D1111423
Bag
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent D1111430
Bag
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent D1104461
HANDBAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
96%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (-1.6%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 253 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month