Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 35/523,984

Shower and toilet chair with wheels and footrest

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Examiner
FOWLER, AARON C
Art Unit
2962
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
R82 A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allow Rate
71 granted / 71 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
2 currently pending
Career history
73
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
69.0%
+29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 71 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . REJECTIONS 35 USC 112(a) and (b) Rejection The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first and second paragraphs, as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or, for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant) regards as the invention. The claim is indefinite and non-enabled due to unclear drawings. The following explains this in greater detail: Figure 1.3: There are several shapes shown back side of the seat back. The depth of these shapes cannot be determined since they are only seen in this view. Figure 1.5: There are several shapes and features shown on the bottom side of the chair which can only be seen in this view. Since these features are only seen from this side, the depth of these features cannot be determined. The drawings must be corrected to describe in full, clear, concise and exact terms what the rejected portions of the design represent. To overcome this rejection, Applicant can convert the portions of the design which are considered indefinite and non-enabled to broken line thereby removing the portions from the claimed design. If portions of the claimed design are converted to broken line, a broken line statement must be added to the specification stating what 1) the broken lines represent (i.e.: Portions of a SHOWER AND TOILET CHAIR WITH WHEELS AND FOOTREST) and 2) if the broken lines form any part of the claimed design. The annotated images below exemplify the areas pointed out above wherein the indefinite and non-enabled shapes and features have been highlighted in a gray color. Figure 1.3 PNG media_image1.png 645 646 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 1.5 PNG media_image2.png 982 774 media_image2.png Greyscale When preparing new or replacement drawings, be careful to avoid introducing new matter. New matter is prohibited by 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.121(f). Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. If all the figures on a drawing sheet are canceled, a replacement sheet is not required. A marked-up copy of the drawing sheet (labeled as “Annotated Sheet”) including an annotation showing that all the figures on that drawing sheet have been canceled must be presented in the amendment or remarks section that explains the change to the drawings. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) as set forth above. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Cody Fowler whose telephone number is (571)272-1226. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9 AM - 3 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If multiple attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Rempfer can be reached on (571)270-0248. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.C.F./Examiner, Art Unit 2933 /Garth Rademaker/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2922
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1122459
Wearable robot for walking assistance
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent D1109031
Wheeled Chair and Walker Combination
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent D1109053
Catamaran
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent D1104882
FRAME FOR A CHAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent D1105268
Scooter
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 71 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month