Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 35/524,089

Trousers

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 20, 2024
Priority
Aug 22, 2023 — JP 2023-016889 D +1 more
Examiner
FABRE, DARCY ANNE
Art Unit
2911
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Land Business Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
98%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 98% — above average
98%
Career Allowance Rate
57 granted / 58 resolved
+38.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
1 currently pending
Career history
61
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
77.6%
+37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 58 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
FINAL REFUSAL Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Amendment Acknowledgement The applicant’s amendments to the specification and drawings filed on 01/21/2026 are acknowledged and have been entered. The amendments have overcome the specification objections and portion of the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112. However, new objectionable issues were added and inconsistent and indefinite areas remain in the drawing disclosure. The following rejection was necessitated by the amendments and is made FINAL. Drawing Objections The drawing disclosure is objected to because the figures should be presented in consecutive order beginning with all figures of the first embodiment (1.1 - 1.6) and followed by all figures of the second embodiment (2.1 - 2.6). Currently, the figures and embodiments are presented out of order, which makes it difficult to understand which figures correspond to which embodiment. When preparing new or replacement drawings, be careful to avoid introducing new matter. New matter is prohibited by 35 U.S.C. §132 and CFR 1.121(f). Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) and (b) The claim is finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) because the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the applicant regards as the invention. The claim is indefinite and nonenabled because of the following: The shape of the belt loops remains inconsistent between the views. For example, in figure 1.1, the front left belt loop appears to have curved sides and a larger bottom than top. However, this belt loop appears to have straight sides and uniform thickness in figures 1.4 and 1.6: PNG media_image1.png 1012 1304 media_image1.png Greyscale The waistband of the trousers remains inconsistently shown between the views. For example, the waistband appears to be of uniform width in figure 1.6, however it appears to be curved and of inconsistent width in figure 1.1. The portion just under the fly button is larger in figure 1.1, the right side of the waistband shows a steep upward curve that isn’t present in 1.6, and the left side shows a downward curve that isn’t present in 1.6: PNG media_image2.png 645 1270 media_image2.png Greyscale Consistency must prevail throughout the application. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion The claimed design stands rejected under 35 U.S.C § 112 (a) and (b). THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Darcy Fabre whose telephone number is 703-756-1394. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Messina Smith can be reached at 571-272-3137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DF/Examiner, Art Unit 2936 /KEVIN K RUDZINSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2911
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 21, 2026
Response Filed
May 19, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1138128
HOLSTER
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent D1132018
Backpack
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent D1131004
Backpack
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent D1120627
ORGANIZER SYSTEM
4y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent D1108774
Wetsuit
1y 10m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
98%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+2.0%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 58 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month