Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 35/524,737

Module for smart lamp

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Examiner
DODSON, CHRISTINA MARIE
Art Unit
2933
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
97%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 97% — above average
97%
Career Allow Rate
106 granted / 109 resolved
+37.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
3 currently pending
Career history
112
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 109 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first and second paragraphs, as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or, for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant) regards as the invention. The claim is indefinite and nonenabling for the following reasons: The appearance and depth(s) of the top edges and surfaces cannot be understood due to the varying line thicknesses and merging lines. Specifically, the number of concentric circles present in the top and perspective views is unclear, which prevents the understanding of the top of the claimed design. PNG media_image1.png 420 1392 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated comparison of enlarged Reps. 1.1 and 1.7 The depth(s) of the small, round features visible only in the rear view of Reproduction 1.4 cannot be understood as disclosed. PNG media_image2.png 283 996 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated comparison of Reps. 1.2 and 1.4 Applicant may indicate that protection is not sought for those portions of the reproductions which are considered indefinite and nonenabling in the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112 above by amending the reproductions to color those portions or convert those portions to broken lines and by amending the specification to include a statement that the portions of the Module for Smart Lamp shown in broken lines form no part of the claimed design or a statement that the portions of the Module for Smart Lamp shown by coloring form no part of the claimed design provided such amendments do not introduce new matter (see 35 U.S.C. 132, 37 CFR 1.121). Corrected drawing sheets are suggested in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the reproductions appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one reproduction is being amended. The reproduction or reproduction number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing reproduction is to be canceled, the appropriate reproduction must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining reproductions must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. If all the reproductions on a drawing sheet are canceled, a replacement sheet is not required. A marked-up copy of the drawing sheet (labeled as “Annotated Sheet”) including an annotation showing that all the reproductions on that drawing sheet have been canceled must be presented in the amendment or remarks section that explains the change to the drawings. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. When preparing new or replacement drawings, be careful to avoid introducing new matter. New matter is prohibited by 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.121(f). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The claim is rejected for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention as required in 35 U.S.C. 112(b). The claim is indefinite because the reproductions include, in figure 1.9, broken lines that are not described in the specification, and the scope of the claimed design cannot be determined. If the broken lines represent portions of the article or environmental structure for which protection is not sought, applicant may overcome this rejection by inserting a statement similar to the following into the specification immediately preceding the claim, provided such statement does not introduce new matter (see 35 U.S.C. 132): --The broken lines shown in the drawings illustrate portions of the Module for Smart Lamp and form no part of the claimed design. -- Conclusion The claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b). The references cited but not applied are considered pertinent art related to the subject matter of the claimed design. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINA M. DODSON whose telephone number is (571)272-9673. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6:00 AM-2:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard Kearney can be reached at (571) 272-8312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINA M. DODSON/Examiner, Art Unit 2933
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1121199
Medical Lamp
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent D1116234
Lamp
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent D1114317
Medical light
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent D1105574
NAIL LAMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent D1104334
LAMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
97%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+3.4%)
1y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 109 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month