Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 35/524,776

Smart lamp

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Examiner
KNOTTS, BAILEY M
Art Unit
2934
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allow Rate
51 granted / 51 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
3 currently pending
Career history
54
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
76.3%
+36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 51 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejection – 35 USC § 112(a) and (b) The claim is rejected under 35 USC § 112(a) and (b), as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. The claim is indefinite and nonenabling because: In Fig. 1.8, the examiner is unable to determine the exact configuration of circular features identified by the arrows on the bottom of the smart lamp. As currently disclosed, the surfaces on the bottom of the smart lamp are not clearly shown as being on the same plane as each other or what might be recessed or raised above other elements. While the circular features may be shown in other views, the showing is obstructed or taken at an angle that does not reconcile the exact depth and form. Therefore, it would be impossible for one skilled in the art to make and use the design without resort to conjecture. PNG media_image1.png 368 377 media_image1.png Greyscale Applicant may overcome this rejection by reducing the elements on the bottom of the smart lamp, to broken lines, thus disclaiming those surfaces. An appropriate broken line statement must be added to the specification following the figure descriptions, but prior to the claim, to read: --The broken lines depict portions of the Smart lamp that form no part of the claim.-- An example is provided below for Applicant’s review. Applicant is reminded that this example should not be used in place of any of their amendments. Applicant must provide their own drawing amendments in their formal reply. PNG media_image2.png 377 379 media_image2.png Greyscale Corrected drawing sheets are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. If all the figures on a drawing sheet are canceled, a replacement sheet is not required. A marked-up copy of the drawing sheet (labeled as “Annotated Sheet”) including an annotation showing that all the figures on that drawing sheet have been canceled must be presented in the amendment or remarks section that explains the change to the drawings. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. Conclusion The claim is rejected under 35 USC § 112(a) and (b). The references are cited as pertinent prior art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAILEY M KNOTTS whose telephone number is (703)756-1860. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 7am-3pm (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lakiya Rogers can be reached on (571) 270-7145. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /B.M.K./Examiner, Art Unit 2934 /LAKIYA G ROGERS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2934
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1117889
Spot light
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent D1105536
Solar Light
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent D1105535
Speaker lamp
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent D1105577
Oil Lamp
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent D1105537
CEILING FAN LIGHT KIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
1y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 51 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month