Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 35/525,823

Stop drill bit for drilling concrete

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 12, 2024
Priority
Feb 01, 2024 — RE 30-2024-0004675
Examiner
ALDIN, OLIVIA H
Art Unit
2951
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Seoul Fastening Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
55 granted / 55 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
2 currently pending
Career history
56
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
66.7%
+26.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 55 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
NOTICE OF PRE-AIA OR AIA STATUS The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . CLAIM REJECTION Non-Statutory Double Patenting General information The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. See In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a non-statutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent is shown to be commonly owned with this application. See 37 CFR 1.131(c). A registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Basis for rejection The claim is provisionally rejected on the grounds of non-statutory double patenting of the claim of US Patent No. US-D1102496-S. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the differences with regards additional straight section under the drill bit section are minor when compared to the overall appearance of the designs. This is a provisional non-statutory double patenting rejection because the conflicting claims have not in fact been patented. It is well settled that it is unobviousness in the overall appearance of the claimed design, when compared with the prior art, rather than minute details or small variations in design as appears to be the case here, that constitutes the test of design patentability. See In re Frick, 275 F2d 741, 125 USPQ 191 (CCPA 1960) and In re Lamb, 286 F2d 610, 128 USPQ 539 (CCPA 1961). PNG media_image1.png 593 409 media_image1.png Greyscale Additional prior art cited The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the claim is rejected under Non-Statutory Double Patenting. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLIVIA ALDIN whose telephone number is (703)756-1468. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00-5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Justin Jonaitis can be reached on 571-270-5150. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /O.H.A./Examiner, Art Unit 2936 /JOSEPH KUKELLA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2961
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1133837
Refrigerator door hinge cover
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent D1126718
SCRAPER
1y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent D1124820
HAMMER
3y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent D1122715
Glass clamping device
1y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent D1114612
Pole clip
1y 3m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 55 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month