Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 35/526,351

Safe

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 17, 2025
Priority
Jan 22, 2025 — CN 202530042092.9
Examiner
OSWECKI, ELIZABETH J
Art Unit
2951
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Deli Group Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
97%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 97% — above average
97%
Career Allowance Rate
1229 granted / 1265 resolved
+37.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
1267
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§102
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§112
87.5%
+47.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1265 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgement is made of the response including the election of Group I, embodiment 1, reproduction views 1.1-1.8 filed on June 12, 2026. Group II, embodiment 2, reproduction views 2.1-2.8 are withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner, 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being for the nonelected design. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on June 12, 2026. In view of the fact that this application is in condition for allowance except for the presence of Group II, embodiment 2, reproduction views 2.1-2.8 directed to a design or designs nonelected without traverse in the reply filed on June 12, 2026, and without the right to petition such Group(s) have been cancelled. OFFICE ACTION Rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 2nd Paragraph Claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The language following the descriptions of the reproductions and preceding the claim in the specification makes the scope of the claim unclear. The sentence reading “The color shown on the claimed design forms no part thereof.” is unclear since the reproductions for the safe are shown entirely in color not as black and white reproductions. The statement, “The color shown on the claimed design forms no part thereof.” contradicts what is shown in the reproduction disclosure since the views of the safe are shown in specific colors. Color may be used to disclaim portions of an article, however the entire article of the safe is shown in color not portions of the safe, so it appears that the entire safe was intended to be claimed not unclaimed. The specification should be consistent and correspond accurately with what is shown in the reproductions so that the scope of the claim is clearly defined. If the claim is directed to only what is shown in the reproductions, then to overcome this rejection, the statement “The color shown on the claimed design forms no part thereof.” should be deleted from the specification. Clarity, consistency and correction of the claim are required in order to obviate this rejection. The claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, (b) paragraphs. The claimed design is patentable over the references cited. The art of record not relied upon is cited as cumulative art. Contact Information: For general information or administrative questions, please call 1-800-786-9199. For fee questions, please contact (571) 272-6400, for questions regarding petitions (571) 272-3282, and questions regarding publications (571) 272-4200. To fax an official response to this action, or to fax any other formal communication you wish to be made of record in this application use 571-273-8300. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-2579. Patentability Contact: Inquiries concerning PATENTABILITY/EXAMINATION of this application should be directed to Elizabeth Oswecki whose telephone number is 571-272-4335. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9-5. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michelle Wilson can be reached on 571-272-7639. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. To schedule an interview, applicant may either call by telephone or use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information Regarding Status of an Application: Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in the Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center andhttps://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Inventor Assistance Center: The Inventors Assistance Center (IAC) provides patent information and services to the public. The IAC is staffed by former Supervisory Patent Examiners and experienced Primary Examiners who answer general questions concerning patent examining policy and procedure. Applicants should contact the IAC concerning payment of FEES, schedule of PRINTING of patents, RECEIPTS, and any other administrative issues. IAC is available M-F 8:30 am-5:00pm EST at 1-800-786-9199 or 703-308-4357 or for TTY 703-305-7785 for customer assistance. /ELIZABETH J OSWECKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2912
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1132537
Locker
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent D1119261
Heel for shoes
1y 4m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent D1117119
Light-emitting semiconductor module
2y 6m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent D1113135
Shoe decoration
1y 11m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent D1109006
Folding altar
1y 7m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
97%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+1.5%)
1y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1265 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month