Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 35/526,811

Bag

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Priority
Mar 03, 2025 — EU 015094132
Examiner
GEBHART, JESSICA MARIE
Art Unit
2951
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Delvaux Createur SA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
98%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 98% — above average
98%
Career Allowance Rate
235 granted / 241 resolved
+37.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
244
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§112
86.7%
+46.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 241 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Foreign Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority based on a certified copy of application number 015094132-0001 filed in the European Union Intellectual Property Office on July 3, 2025 as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejection - 35 USC §112(a)&(b) The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a)&(b), as the claimed invention is not described in such a full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor regards as the invention. The claim is indefinite and non-enabling for the following reasons: A.) There are inconsistencies in the left side of the bag in Rep. 1.4 when compared to the same areas of the bag shown in Reps. 1.1-1.3 as follows: 1.) There is a line from the strap overlapping the D-ring at the top of the bag in 1.4. This is inconsistent from Rep. 1.1 that shows no lines from the strap overlapping the D-ring. See “1” in the following illustration that points to this inconsistency. 2.) Rep. 1.4 shows no stitching at the top and bottom of the bag, but stitching is shown in these areas in Reps. 1.1-1.3. See “2” in the following illustration that points to this inconsistency. 3.) The piece that connects to the D-ring is not inset from the body of the bag in Rep. 1.4, but Reps. 1.1 and 1.2 show this piece as inset from the body of the bag. See “3” in the following illustration that points to this inconsistency. PNG media_image1.png 1346 1429 media_image1.png Greyscale To overcome this rejection, the Examiner suggests for the Applicant to amend the left side of the bag so it is shown consistently throughout the reproductions. B.) There are inconsistencies in the width of the body of the bag shown in Rep. 1.7 when compared to rep. 1.4. Rep. 1.7 shows more lines creating the body of the bag, and the bag widens in the center. Rep. 1.4 shows fewer lines forming the body of the bag and the lines are parallel. The bag is the same width from top to bottom in Rep. 1.4. See the following illustration that PNG media_image2.png 1259 1026 media_image2.png Greyscale points to this inconsistency. To overcome this rejection, the Examiner suggests for the Applicant to amend the width of the body of the bag so it is shown consistently throughout the reproductions. PNG media_image3.png 1445 1552 media_image3.png Greyscale C.) There is no stitching shown on the strap interior in Rep. 1.4, but stitching is shown on the interior strap in Reps. 1.1-1.3. See the following illustration that points to this inconsistency. To overcome this rejection, the Examiner suggests for the Applicant to amend the stitching shown on the inner strap for consistency throughout the reproductions. When preparing new or replacement reproductions, be careful to avoid introducing new matter. New matter is prohibited by 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.121(f). Any amended replacement reproduction sheet should include all of the reproductions appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one reproduction is being amended. The reproduction or reproduction number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing reproduction is to be canceled, the appropriate reproduction must be removed from the replacement reproduction sheet, and where necessary, the remaining reproductions must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement reproduction sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining reproductions. If all the reproductions on a sheet are canceled, a replacement reproduction sheet is not required. A marked-up copy of the reproduction sheet (labeled as “Annotated Sheet”) including an annotation showing that all the reproductions on that sheet have been canceled must be presented in the amendment or remarks section that explains the change to the reproductions. Each reproduction sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. Conclusion The claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a)&(b). The references cited but not applied are considered cumulative art related to the claimed design. When Responding to Official USPTO Correspondence When responding to an official correspondence issued by the USPTO, including refusals, Notice of Allowances, or Notice of Abandonments, please note the following: The USPTO transacts business in writing. Applicants may submit replies to Office actions only by: Online via the USPTO's Electronic Filing System-Web (EFS-Web) (Registered eFilers only): https://patentcenter.uspto.gov Mail: Commissioner For Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA, 22313-1450 Mailing should be done sufficiently in advance to ensure the USPTO receipt prior to reply period expiration. Facsimile to the USPTO's Official Fax Number (571-273-8300) Do Not Fax Formal Drawings. Hand-carry to USPTO's Alexandria, Virginia Customer Service Window For additional information regarding responding to office actions see: https://www.uspto.gov/patents-maintaining-patent/responding-office-actions Note that correspondence received will appear in Patent Center, which may be viewed by the applicant at: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov Contact and Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA M GEBHART whose telephone number is (571)272-9690. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 7:30 am to 5:30 pm EST. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s Supervisor, Ian Simmons, can be reached at telephone number 571-272-2658. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSICA M GEBHART/Examiner, Art Unit 2913
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 03, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1127393
Handbag
1y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent D1127394
Handbag
1y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent D1120620
Bag
1y 8m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent D1114484
Handbag
1y 3m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent D1113146
WALLET STAND FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
98%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (-1.4%)
1y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 241 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month