Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 35/528,313

Measuring machine

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 31, 2025
Examiner
ARNTZEN, MARY ANNE ELIZABETH
Art Unit
2914
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Hexagon Technology Center GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 12m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allow Rate
63 granted / 63 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
1 currently pending
Career history
64
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 63 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Acknowledgement of Foreign Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in World Intellectual Property Organization Application No. WIPO151431, filed on August 02 2024. Restriction Requirement This application discloses the following embodiments: Embodiment 1 - Figs. 1.1-1.7 Embodiment 2 – Figs. 2.1-2.7 Embodiment 3 - Figs. 3.1-3.7 Multiple embodiments of a single inventive concept may be included in the same design application only if they are patentably indistinct. In re Rubinfield, 270 F. 2d 391, 123 USPQ 210 (CCPA 1959). Embodiments that are patentably distinct from one another do not constitute a single inventive concept and thus may not be included in the same design application. See In re Platner, 155 USPQ 222 (Comm'r Pat. 1967). The above embodiments divide into the following patentably distinct groups of designs: Group I: Embodiment 1 Group II: Embodiment 2 and 3 The embodiments disclosed within each group have overall appearances that are basically the same. Furthermore, the differences between them are considered minor and patentably indistinct, or are shown to be obvious in view analogous prior art cited. Therefore, they are considered by the examiner to be obvious variations of one another within the group. These embodiments thus comprise a single inventive concept and are grouped together. However, Embodiment 1 shows portions of the Measuring Machine that are unclaimed, including the rail of the horizontal axis, the back of the vertical axis, portions of the right and left sides, and the back of the vertical axis. Embodiment 2 and 3 have no unclaimed portions. The unclaimed portions patentably distinguishes Group 1 from the other. PNG media_image1.png 619 659 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 624 660 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 632 648 media_image3.png Greyscale Because of the differences identified, the embodiments of each Group are considered to either have overall appearances that are not basically the same, or if they are basically the same, the differences are not minor and patentably indistinct or are not shown to be obvious in view of analogous prior art. Restriction is required under 35 U.S.C. 121 to one of the patentably distinct groups of the designs. A reply to this requirement must include an election of a single group for prosecution on the merits, even if this requirement is traversed, 37 CFR 1.143. Any reply that does not include election of a single group will be held non-responsive. Applicant is also requested to direct cancellation of all drawing figures and the corresponding descriptions which are directed to nonelected groups. Should applicant traverse this requirement on the grounds that the groups comprise a single inventive concept or are not patentably distinct, applicant should present evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the groups to be obvious variations of one another. If groups are determined not to be patentably distinct and they remain in this application, any rejection of one group over prior art will apply equally to all other groups. See Ex parte Appeal No. 315-40, 152 USPQ 71 (Bd. App. 1965). No argument asserting patentability between the groups will be considered once the groups have been determined to comprise a single inventive concept. In view of the above requirement, action on the merits is deferred pending compliance with the requirement in accordance with Ex parte Heckman, 135 USPQ 229 (P.O. Super. Exam. 1960). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 (a) and (b) The claim is rejected under 35 USC 112 (a) and (b), first and second paragraphs, as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The claim is indefinite because the applicant has included break lines in the drawings but has not defined them in the specification. Break lines may not be used to indicate an indeterminate length. As such, the following statement should be added to the specification, to ensure that the claim will be interpreted in a definite manner: “The drawings contain symbolic break lines in Fig. 1.1-1.5. Any portion between the break lines forms no part of the claimed design.” Conclusion The claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a)&(b). A response is required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amendment submitted in response to this Office action must be in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARY ANNE ARNTZEN whose telephone number is (703)756-1439. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sandra Snapp can be reached at (571) 272-8364. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.A.A./Examiner, Art Unit 2914 /BRETT MILLER/Examiner, Art Unit 2934
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1106843
Thermometer base
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent D1106860
Earring
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent D1106861
Earring
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent D1106875
Earring
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent D1104807
WEIGHING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
1y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 63 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month