Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 35/528,313

Measuring machine

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 31, 2025
Priority
Aug 02, 2024 — IN WIPO151431
Examiner
ARNTZEN, MARY ANNE ELIZABETH
Art Unit
2914
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Hexagon AB
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
63 granted / 63 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 63 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Acknowledgement of Foreign Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in World Intellectual Property Organization Application No. WIPO151431, filed on August 02, 2024. Response to Restriction/Election Requirement The examiner acknowledges that the applicant has elected Group I, Embodiment 1, Fig. 1.1-1.7. Response to Amendment The examiner acknowledges that the applicant has amended the specification to define the break lines. Specification Objection In accordance with the election, the applicant should amend the specification to remove reference to other embodiments. The wording of a design patent claim is statutory (37 CFR 1.153). Accordingly, the phrase in the claim reading: [The original design] must be amended to read -- The ornamental design -- Drawing Objection In accordance with the election, the applicant should cancel drawing Fig. 2.1-2.7 and 3.1-3.7. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 (a) and (b) The claim is rejected under 35 USC 112 (a) and (b), first and second paragraphs, as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The claim is indefinite and non-enabling for the following inconsistencies: Fig. 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6; show broken lines on linear markings over curved corners on the front of the vertical axis. It is unclear to the examiner whether the broken lines are meant to convey that the portions of the linear markings are unclaimed or whether the linear markings and the portion of the front between the broken lines are unclaimed. PNG media_image1.png 635 673 media_image1.png Greyscale To overcome this rejection, the applicant should clarify whether the linear markings or the linear markings and the areas between them are unclaimed. If the space between the markings is unclaimed, the applicant should submit replacement drawings with horizontal broken lines between the unclaimed linear markings. A boundary line may be shown in broken lines if it is not intended to form part of the claimed design. Applicant may choose to define the bounds of a claimed design with broken lines when the boundary does not exist in reality in the article embodying the design. It would be understood that the claimed design extends to the boundary but does not include the boundary. As it is possible that broken lines with different purposes may be included in a single application, the description must make a visual distinction between the two purposes. The following sentence should be inserted in the specification following the figure descriptions and preceding the Claim. -- The broken lines which define the bounds of the claimed depict the limits of the claim and form no part of the claimed design.-- PNG media_image2.png 620 690 media_image2.png Greyscale When preparing new or replacement drawings, be careful to avoid introducing new matter. New matter is prohibited by 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.121(f). Conclusion The claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a)&(b). A response is required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amendment submitted in response to this Office action must be in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARY ANNE ARNTZEN whose telephone number is (703)756-1439. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sandra Snapp can be reached at (571) 272-8364. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.A.A./Examiner, Art Unit 2914 /LEANNE WAS-ENGLEHART/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2934
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1141966
Meat thermometer with wireless probes
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent D1126033
Earring
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent D1124942
Earring
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent D1124944
Earring
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent D1106843
Thermometer base
1y 8m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 63 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month