Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

1080 Network LLC

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

1080 Network LLC is managing a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 2 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, indicating a varied range of review within the USPTO. The busiest examiner, PINSKY, DOUGLAS W, is currently handling 1 pending action. This suggests that the workload is evenly spread, as no single examiner is managing more than 1 of the company's 2 pending actions. The focus on 2 distinct examiners suggests that the company's current legal strategy involves multiple points of contact.

The portfolio's reach extends across 2 distinct art units, which matches the number of distinct examiners involved. This variety shows that the company's 2 pending office actions involve different technical specialties or mechanical applications. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution strategy must be adapted to the specific standards of 2 different art units and 2 different examiners. The presence of 2 pending actions across these units reflects a distributed prosecution profile where each matter is handled by a unique examiner. PINSKY, DOUGLAS W holds 1 pending action, making their specific examination style a factor in the company's current prosecution outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
50% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PINSKY, DOUGLAS W 1 24.2% +15.4%
POPHAM, JEFFREY D 1 37.7% +23.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18329107 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTING PLATFORMS FOR EXECUTING CREDENTIAL-LESS NETWORK-BASED COMMUNICATION EXCHANGES POPHAM, JEFFREY D 239d overdue
18343433 NETWORK-LEVEL POLICY VALIDATION FOR NETWORK-BASED EXCHANGES PINSKY, DOUGLAS W —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18329107 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTING PLATFORMS FOR EXECUTING CREDENTIAL-LESS NETWORK-BASED COMMUNICATION EXCHANGES POPHAM, JEFFREY D 239d overdue
18343433 NETWORK-LEVEL POLICY VALIDATION FOR NETWORK-BASED EXCHANGES PINSKY, DOUGLAS W —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3626 1
2432 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18343433 NETWORK-LEVEL POLICY VALIDATION FOR NETWORK-BASED EXCHANGES PINSKY, DOUGLAS W 3626 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2023
18329107 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTING PLATFORMS FOR EXECUTING CREDENTIAL-LESS NETWORK-BASED COMMUNICATION EXCHANGES POPHAM, JEFFREY D 2432 §103§112 Non-Final OA 239d overdue Pending Jun 05, 2023

Managing 1080 Network LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does 1080 Network LLC have?

1080 Network LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most 1080 Network LLC applications?

Douglas W Pinsky has the most, with 1 of 1080 Network LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are 1080 Network LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month