Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

206 Ortho, Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

206 Ortho, Inc. has 4 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. The use of 3 art units for 4 actions indicates that the company's chemistry-related applications are somewhat concentrated in specific technical fields but still span multiple specialized units.

JONES, DIANA S is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. With 4 distinct examiners involved, the portfolio is subject to multiple independent reviews, ensuring that the company receives a variety of perspectives on its material science innovations. This distribution across 4 examiners for 4 pending actions means that each matter is being handled by a different individual.

The company's presence in 3 distinct art units suggests a focused research and development strategy within the Chemistry & Materials sector. By managing 4 pending office actions through 4 different examiners, the company can gather diverse feedback on its claim strategies. This arrangement reduces the risk that a single examiner's interpretation will negatively impact the entire pending portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (25%)
3
Easy (75%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (25%)
§112 only2 (50%)
Double-patenting only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JONES, DIANA S 1 75.1% +20.3%
SALVATORE, LYNDA 1 64.2% +19.1%
HAGOPIAN, CASEY SHEA 1 54.3% +33.4%
MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 1 54.0% +30.2%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17776581 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DESIGNS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND IMPLANTS MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 145d overdue
18952673 DEGRADABLE COMPOSITE AND METHOD OF FABRICATION JONES, DIANA S 74d overdue
18252849 ELONGATED COMPOSITE FOR AN IMPLANT HAGOPIAN, CASEY SHEA 74d overdue
18515020 DEGRADABLE COMPOSITE AND METHOD OF FABRICATION SALVATORE, LYNDA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1789 2
3775 1
1617 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18952673 DEGRADABLE COMPOSITE AND METHOD OF FABRICATION JONES, DIANA S 3775 §102 Final Rejection 74d overdue Pending Nov 19, 2024
18515020 DEGRADABLE COMPOSITE AND METHOD OF FABRICATION SALVATORE, LYNDA 1789 DP Final Rejection — Pending Nov 20, 2023
18252849 ELONGATED COMPOSITE FOR AN IMPLANT HAGOPIAN, CASEY SHEA 1617 §112 Final Rejection 74d overdue Pending May 12, 2023
17776581 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DESIGNS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND IMPLANTS MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 1789 §112 Non-Final OA 145d overdue Pending May 12, 2022

Managing 206 Ortho, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does 206 Ortho, Inc. have?

206 Ortho, Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most 206 Ortho, Inc. applications?

Diana S Jones has the most, with 1 of 206 Ortho, Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are 206 Ortho, Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month