Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
2308134 Ontario Inc. maintains a patent portfolio focused on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action across its entire filing history. This activity is situated in 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow technical focus for its current intellectual property efforts. Prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the company's current legal interactions.
The busiest examiner identified in the data is RAZA, ZEHRA, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. This single action represents the totality of the company's active prosecution workload. For a practitioner, this means the current strategy is focused on a single examiner within a single art unit. The alignment between the total pending actions and the busiest examiner's workload confirms that there is no diversification of examiner assignments at this stage. This concentration allows for a highly specific approach to the pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAZA, ZEHRA | 1 | 45.3% | +48.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18769475 | System and Method for Brokering the Publication of Media Content | RAZA, ZEHRA | 11d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18769475 | System and Method for Brokering the Publication of Media Content | RAZA, ZEHRA | 11d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3697 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18769475 | System and Method for Brokering the Publication of Media Content | RAZA, ZEHRA | 3697 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Jul 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial