Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

2hr Learning Inc.

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§101 + other2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
REFAI, SAM M 1 34.8% +7.5%
DURAN, ARTHUR D 1 15.6% +24.0%
GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A 1 22.2% +23.7%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19218320 AUTOMATED EVALUATATION OF USER SUBJECT MATTER MASTERY STATUS BASED ON ONE OR MORE ACADEMIC STANDARDS REFAI, SAM M 35d
19218318 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO TRACK MASTERY AND REWARD GAMIFICATION POINTS TO A USER ON AN ONLINE LEARNING PLATFORM DURAN, ARTHUR D
19177471 Automated Evaluation and Feedback of Participant Online Testing GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19218318 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO TRACK MASTERY AND REWARD GAMIFICATION POINTS TO A USER ON AN ONLINE LEARNING PLATFORM DURAN, ARTHUR D
19177471 Automated Evaluation and Feedback of Participant Online Testing GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3621 1
3622 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19218320 AUTOMATED EVALUATATION OF USER SUBJECT MATTER MASTERY STATUS BASED ON ONE OR MORE ACADEMIC STANDARDS REFAI, SAM M 3621 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 35d Pending May 25, 2025
19218318 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO TRACK MASTERY AND REWARD GAMIFICATION POINTS TO A USER ON AN ONLINE LEARNING PLATFORM DURAN, ARTHUR D 3622 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending May 25, 2025
19177471 Automated Evaluation and Feedback of Participant Online Testing GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A §101 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 11, 2025

Managing 2hr Learning Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month