Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
3A Composites Mobility AG currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, which indicates a very focused interaction with the USPTO at this time. Because the entire active portfolio consists of a single case, the prosecution strategy is highly concentrated. This suggests that the company's current legal efforts are directed toward a specific technical advancement within the transportation field, requiring a precise approach to patenting. The involvement of a distinct art unit means the company is subject to the unique examination style of a specific group.
JONES, JAMES WILLIAM is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there is only a single examiner and a single art unit involved, the outcome of the prosecution depends on the review standards of that specific department. Practitioners should note that the lack of diversification across different art units means the company cannot compare rejection patterns across multiple examiners. The 1 pending office action represents the full extent of the active Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems workload, and the centralized nature of this review may allow for a more direct dialogue with the USPTO. Maintaining consistency in technical arguments is crucial when a portfolio is confined to a single point of contact.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JONES, JAMES WILLIAM | 1 | 73.9% | +20.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18684015 | FIRE-PROTECTED FLOOR STRUCTURE OF A WAGON BODY OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONSTRUCTION | JONES, JAMES WILLIAM | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18684015 | FIRE-PROTECTED FLOOR STRUCTURE OF A WAGON BODY OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONSTRUCTION | JONES, JAMES WILLIAM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18684015 | FIRE-PROTECTED FLOOR STRUCTURE OF A WAGON BODY OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONSTRUCTION | JONES, JAMES WILLIAM | 3615 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial3A Composites Mobility AG has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
James William Jones has the most, with 1 of 3A Composites Mobility AG's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
