Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
3Ascreen Corporation currently has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across the 2 distinct art units and examiners involved in the portfolio. This distribution shows that the company's pending matters are spread across different technical and personnel groups at the patent office.
The busiest examiner, HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Given that each examiner is handling exactly 1 action, the prosecution environment remains decentralized. This structure ensures that the company's current applications are not concentrated under a single examiner or art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE | 1 | 46.8% | +30.6% |
| MANCHO, RONNIE M | 1 | 76.0% | +2.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18637845 | REALISTIC EYEBALL AND ROBOT | MANCHO, RONNIE M | 84d |
| 18637924 | REALISTIC EYEBALL AND ROBOT | HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18637924 | REALISTIC EYEBALL AND ROBOT | HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3711 | 1 |
| 3657 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18637924 | REALISTIC EYEBALL AND ROBOT | HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE | 3711 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 17, 2024 |
| 18637845 | REALISTIC EYEBALL AND ROBOT | MANCHO, RONNIE M | 3657 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 84d | Pending | Apr 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial