Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
41 Elacopter Aircompany Mad S L holds a company patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action, which is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This matter is located within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the company's current prosecution is focused on a specific technical classification. This concentration allows for a direct interaction with the patent office regarding the company's transportation-related inventions.
WALTER, KATHERINE JUNE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending office action in total, WALTER, KATHERINE JUNE is the official overseeing the company's active applications. The 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit reflect a centralized prosecution strategy. Practitioners should monitor the progress of this 1 pending office action to gain insight into the examiner's interpretation of the technology. Success in this matter will depend on addressing the specific concerns of WALTER, KATHERINE JUNE within the assigned art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WALTER, KATHERINE JUNE | 1 | 71.7% | +20.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18875606 | LIFT MODULE FOR VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING AIRCRAFT AND AIRCRAFT INCORPORATING SUCH A MODULE | WALTER, KATHERINE JUNE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18875606 | LIFT MODULE FOR VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING AIRCRAFT AND AIRCRAFT INCORPORATING SUCH A MODULE | WALTER, KATHERINE JUNE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3647 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18875606 | LIFT MODULE FOR VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING AIRCRAFT AND AIRCRAFT INCORPORATING SUCH A MODULE | WALTER, KATHERINE JUNE | 3647 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial41 Elacopter Aircompany Mad S L has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Katherine June Walter has the most, with 1 of 41 Elacopter Aircompany Mad S L's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
