Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

A R C Laser GmbH

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

A R C Laser GmbH is managing 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's pending research covers different specialized fields within the sector. The involvement of multiple art units suggests a technical footprint that spans several areas of review.

Prosecution is handled by a pair of distinct examiners. CIRULNICK, EMILY NICOLE is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 pending office action. With two distinct examiners for the pending office actions, each application is being reviewed independently. This means that the practitioner must manage separate prosecution tracks, each tailored to the specific examiner and art unit involved. The distribution among the 2 distinct examiners ensures that the outcome of one pending office action does not necessarily influence the other.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CIRULNICK, EMILY NICOLE 1 40.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18711443 OPHTHALMIC MASK, OPHTHALMIC DEVICE AND USE THEREOF CIRULNICK, EMILY NICOLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18711443 OPHTHALMIC MASK, OPHTHALMIC DEVICE AND USE THEREOF CIRULNICK, EMILY NICOLE 3792 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 17, 2024

Managing A R C Laser GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does A R C Laser GmbH have?

A R C Laser GmbH has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most A R C Laser GmbH applications?

Emily Nicole Cirulnick has the most, with 1 of A R C Laser GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are A R C Laser GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month