Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Aarke AB

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Aarke AB has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. Despite the multiple examiners, the portfolio is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a consistent technical classification for the pending applications. For a practitioner, this means that while different individuals are reviewing the cases, they are likely applying the same internal guidelines and prior art databases common to that specific art unit.

CAMPBELL, THOR S is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. This examiner handles half of the 2 pending office actions currently active. The use of 2 distinct examiners within 1 distinct art unit shows that while the technical field is narrow, the workload is shared among different personnel at the patent office. This distribution allows for a comparison of examiner behaviors within the same art unit, which can be useful for developing a more robust prosecution strategy across the company's mechanical engineering portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CAMPBELL, THOR S 1 75.0% +1.0%
FERDOUSI, FAHMIDA NMN 1 42.6% +32.8%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18252328 CARBONATOR OF USER-FRIENDLY DESIGN AND METHOD OF CARBONATING A BEVERAGE FERDOUSI, FAHMIDA NMN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3761 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18550633 CARBONATOR COMPARTMENT CAMPBELL, THOR S 3761 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 14, 2023
18252328 CARBONATOR OF USER-FRIENDLY DESIGN AND METHOD OF CARBONATING A BEVERAGE FERDOUSI, FAHMIDA NMN 3761 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2023

Managing Aarke AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month