Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Abbeytex Pty Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This activity is confined to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, representing a singular point of contact within the patent office. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the underlying technology is categorized within a specific material science or chemical processing domain.
The busiest examiner assigned to this portfolio is BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH, who is responsible for 1 pending. Because this examiner handles the only active matter, the prosecution timeline for the company is entirely subject to the workload and response times of this specific individual. This creates a direct relationship between the applicant and the examiner without the variance seen in larger portfolios with more distributed workloads.
With 1 pending office action, the administrative burden is low, as there are no competing deadlines across different examiners. The focus on 1 distinct art unit allows for a deep dive into the specific prior art and examination trends prevalent in that unit. Practitioners should tailor their arguments to the specific expectations of BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH to move the application toward a final resolution in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH | 1 | 51.8% | +45.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17998182 | GELCOAT COMPOSITIONS FOR SANITISED WATER POOLS | BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH | 63d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1765 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17998182 | GELCOAT COMPOSITIONS FOR SANITISED WATER POOLS | BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH | 1765 | §103 | Final Rejection | 63d | Pending | Nov 08, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial