Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Abc Marketing Inc. maintains a portfolio focused on Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics with 1 pending office action. This active matter is distributed across 1 distinct art unit and is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The examiner EIDE, ERIC T serves as the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action.
The concentration of the portfolio within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area reflects a specialized technical focus for the company's current filings. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the entirety of the company's immediate prosecution activity is managed by EIDE, ERIC T. This singular point of contact simplifies the current administrative oversight required for the portfolio.
With 1 distinct examiner handling the only pending matter, the company's prosecution results are presently tied to the specific evaluation of that individual. The 1 distinct art unit classification ensures that the company's current intellectual property efforts remain within a specific technical domain. This volume of active responses represents the total workload required from the applicant at this time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIDE, ERIC T | 1 | 66.9% | +22.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19097392 | Linear Lighting and Retaining System | EIDE, ERIC T | 119d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2875 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19097392 | Linear Lighting and Retaining System | EIDE, ERIC T | 2875 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 119d overdue | Pending | Apr 01, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial