Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Abridge AI Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, which indicates that each case is receiving an independent review. BOGGS JR., JAMES is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, though he is currently responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action.
The administrative data shows that the company's prosecution is occurring within 2 distinct art units. This suggests that the technical subject matter is concentrated within a specific range of communications classifications. For a practitioner, the use of 2 distinct art units means that the prosecution strategy must account for the specific standards of these 2 different divisions. The 2 pending office actions represent the total active pipeline for the company.
Because BOGGS JR., JAMES handles 1 busiest examiner pending office action, the workload is distributed among the available officials. The involvement of 2 distinct examiners ensures that the portfolio's outcomes are not dependent on the tendencies of this individual alone. Practitioners should monitor the feedback from each examiner to identify any common themes that may arise across the 2 pending office actions in the Communications sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOGGS JR., JAMES | 1 | 62.9% | +36.0% |
| DESIR, PIERRE LOUIS | 1 | 61.8% | +34.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18196069 | SURFACING SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | BOGGS JR., JAMES | — |
| 18134090 | AUTOMATING FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS FROM CONVERSATIONS | DESIR, PIERRE LOUIS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18196069 | SURFACING SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | BOGGS JR., JAMES | — |
| 18134090 | AUTOMATING FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS FROM CONVERSATIONS | DESIR, PIERRE LOUIS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2657 | 1 |
| 2659 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18196069 | SURFACING SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | BOGGS JR., JAMES | 2657 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 11, 2023 |
| 18134090 | AUTOMATING FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS FROM CONVERSATIONS | DESIR, PIERRE LOUIS | 2659 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAbridge AI Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
James Boggs Jr. has the most, with 1 of Abridge AI Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
