Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (H O D N Lumc)

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (H O D N Lumc) is currently processing 5 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These 5 actions are spread across 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. This total lack of overlap indicates that every pending matter is being examined independently by different personnel in different administrative groups. Such a distribution suggests that the company's intellectual property in this space is being evaluated from various technical perspectives within the 5 distinct art units.

REILLY, SOPHIA JANE is the busiest examiner, managing 1 of the 5 pending office actions. Since there are 5 distinct art units involved, the company must adapt to five different examination environments. The distribution across 5 distinct examiners ensures that the prosecution of the 5 pending office actions is not centralized under any single individual's discretion. Practitioners should prepare for varied examiner perspectives, as the 5 distinct art units may have different internal guidelines or prior art focuses within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (50%)
§103 only1 (25%)
§102 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 1 72.1% +17.0%
DELEO, VICTORIA LYNN 1 41.4% -44.4%
RAUBENSTRAW, TYLER ALLEN 1 71.2% +30.6%
GUSTILO, ESTELLA M 1 53.6% +34.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17919138 METHODS FOR INDUCTION OF ENDOGENOUS TANDEM DUPLICATION EVENTS DELEO, VICTORIA LYNN —
16521430 T CELL RECEPTORS DIRECTED AGAINST THE PREFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED ANTIGEN OF MELANOMA AND USES THEREOF GUSTILO, ESTELLA M —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18030356 SURGICAL TOOL, SYSTEM AND METHOD LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 28d
17760105 Apparatus for Prevention of Apnea RAUBENSTRAW, TYLER ALLEN —
16521430 T CELL RECEPTORS DIRECTED AGAINST THE PREFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED ANTIGEN OF MELANOMA AND USES THEREOF GUSTILO, ESTELLA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 1
1662 1
3785 1
1646 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18030356 SURGICAL TOOL, SYSTEM AND METHOD LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 3771 §102 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Apr 05, 2023
17919138 METHODS FOR INDUCTION OF ENDOGENOUS TANDEM DUPLICATION EVENTS DELEO, VICTORIA LYNN 1662 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 14, 2022
17760105 Apparatus for Prevention of Apnea RAUBENSTRAW, TYLER ALLEN 3785 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 04, 2022
16521430 T CELL RECEPTORS DIRECTED AGAINST THE PREFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED ANTIGEN OF MELANOMA AND USES THEREOF GUSTILO, ESTELLA M 1646 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2019

Managing Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (H O D N Lumc)'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (H O D N Lumc) have?

Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (H O D N Lumc) has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (H O D N Lumc) applications?

Brooke N Labranche has the most, with 1 of Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (H O D N Lumc)'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (H O D N Lumc)'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month