Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
27 pending office actions • 19 art units • 27 examiners • 0 of 27 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 127 patents granted in the last 365 days
Accenture Global Solutions Limited has 26 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The matters are assigned to 26 examiners across 19 art units, demonstrating broad prosecution activity across the software examination landscape. This distribution favors structured portfolio management, with separate tracking for claim themes, cited art, amendment history, and examiner practice.
YESILDAG, MEHMET is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. No examiner has a larger recorded share, so counsel should treat the portfolio as decentralized rather than build strategy around one examiner relationship. Art-unit review may be more useful for identifying recurring treatment of software functionality, computer implementation, or technical effect.
The computing and software classification can bring different eligibility, novelty, and obviousness concerns depending on the claimed implementation. A consistent technical narrative should be maintained across applications, but arguments should connect that narrative to the concrete limitations and evidence in each file.
With activity spread across many assignments, coordination can help prevent inconsistent admissions or unnecessary narrowing. Practitioners should also identify related applications early so that amendments in one matter do not undermine claim scope or written-description positions elsewhere.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 6 (22%) |
| §101 + other | 14 (52%) |
| §103 only | 4 (15%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (11%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YESILDAG, MEHMET | 1 | 33.7% | +28.3% |
| WEBB III, JAMES L | 1 | 13.9% | +21.9% |
| CHISM, STEVEN R | 1 | 30.8% | +42.3% |
| HASKINS, TWYLER LAMB | 1 | 58.1% | +8.6% |
| SINGH, GURKANWALJIT | 1 | 60.8% | +26.4% |
| GILLS, KURTIS | 1 | 58.0% | +28.8% |
| HYTREK, ASHLEY LYNN | 1 | 89.7% | +12.0% |
| HENRY, MATTHEW D | 1 | 29.7% | +19.7% |
| ANDERSON, SCOTT C | 1 | 58.6% | +31.8% |
| GIROUX, GEORGE | 1 | 65.4% | +27.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18821834 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING ROBOTIC INSTRUCTIONS | HYTREK, ASHLEY LYNN | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17195890 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MACHINE LEARNING BASED USER EXPERIENCE EVALUATION FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES | HATCHER, DEIRDRE D | 294d overdue |
| 18101579 | SYSTEM FOR PROBABILISTIC MODELING AND MULTI-LAYER MODELING FOR DIGITAL TWINS | TRIEU, EM N | 15d |
| 18135920 | DATA ENTHALPY BASED INTELLIGENT DATA INSIGHT GENERATION SYSTEM | BROWN, SARA GRACE | 69d |
| 18340936 | BATTERY TESTING SYSTEM AND APPARATUS WITH DYNAMIC FORCE APPLICATION | FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH | 82d |
| 19076318 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS DURING PROCESS ASSESSMENT | YESILDAG, MEHMET | — |
| 19049710 | DISTRIBUTED AGENTIC SYSTEM FOR HANDLING REQUESTS SPECIFIC TO OPERATIONS AND METHOD THEREOF | WEBB III, JAMES L | — |
| 19046141 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING OUTCOME FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION | CHISM, STEVEN R | — |
| 19033745 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING LOCATION RECOMMENDATIONS | SINGH, GURKANWALJIT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19076318 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS DURING PROCESS ASSESSMENT | YESILDAG, MEHMET | — |
| 19049710 | DISTRIBUTED AGENTIC SYSTEM FOR HANDLING REQUESTS SPECIFIC TO OPERATIONS AND METHOD THEREOF | WEBB III, JAMES L | — |
| 19046141 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING OUTCOME FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION | CHISM, STEVEN R | — |
| 19033745 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING LOCATION RECOMMENDATIONS | SINGH, GURKANWALJIT | — |
| 19034205 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RESOLUTIONS USING KNOWLEDGE GRAPH AND SEMANTIC SIMILARITY | GILLS, KURTIS | — |
| 18821834 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING ROBOTIC INSTRUCTIONS | HYTREK, ASHLEY LYNN | — |
| 18808915 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR OBSOLESCENCE PREDICTION | HENRY, MATTHEW D | — |
| 18674398 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING AND QUERYING DATA PERTAINING TO AN ENTERPRISE | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 4 |
| 3625 | 4 |
| 2128 | 2 |
| 2127 | 2 |
| 3692 | 1 |
| 2639 | 1 |
| 2665 | 1 |
| 3694 | 1 |
| 2154 | 1 |
| 3729 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19076318 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS DURING PROCESS ASSESSMENT | YESILDAG, MEHMET | 3624 | §101§102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 11, 2025 |
| 19049710 | DISTRIBUTED AGENTIC SYSTEM FOR HANDLING REQUESTS SPECIFIC TO OPERATIONS AND METHOD THEREOF | WEBB III, JAMES L | 3624 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 10, 2025 |
| 19046141 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING OUTCOME FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION | CHISM, STEVEN R | 3692 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 05, 2025 |
| 19036861 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VEHICLE TOLL MANAGEMENT | HASKINS, TWYLER LAMB | 2639 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 24, 2025 |
| 19033745 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING LOCATION RECOMMENDATIONS | SINGH, GURKANWALJIT | 3625 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 22, 2025 |
| 19034205 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RESOLUTIONS USING KNOWLEDGE GRAPH AND SEMANTIC SIMILARITY | GILLS, KURTIS | 3624 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 22, 2025 |
| 18821834 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING ROBOTIC INSTRUCTIONS | HYTREK, ASHLEY LYNN | 2665 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 30, 2024 |
| 18808915 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR OBSOLESCENCE PREDICTION | HENRY, MATTHEW D | 3625 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 19, 2024 |
| 18674398 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING AND QUERYING DATA PERTAINING TO AN ENTERPRISE | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | 3694 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 24, 2024 |
| 18602139 | INTELLIGENT PROMPT EVALUATION AND ENHANCEMENT FOR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROCESSING | GIROUX, GEORGE | 2128 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 12, 2024 |
| 18597479 | DECISION ENGINE FOR COMPUTING SYSTEM ENERGY MANAGEMENT | BOLEN, NICHOLAS D | 3624 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 06, 2024 |
| 18393864 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BASED DATA PRODUCT PROVISIONING | ALLEN, NICHOLAS E | 2154 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 22, 2023 |
| 18241397 | CIRCULAR MANUFACTURING OF TEXTILE-BASED SENSORS | CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU | 3729 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 01, 2023 |
| 18356832 | Rule-Based Hypothesis Refinement for Link Prediction Systems | ANDERSON-FEARS, KEENAN NEIL | 2122 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 21, 2023 |
| 18340936 | BATTERY TESTING SYSTEM AND APPARATUS WITH DYNAMIC FORCE APPLICATION | FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH | 1728 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 82d | Pending | Jun 26, 2023 |
| 18309375 | CLASSIFICATION AND SIMILARITY DETECTION OF MULTI-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS | PIERRE LOUIS, ANDRE | 2187 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 28, 2023 |
| 18135920 | DATA ENTHALPY BASED INTELLIGENT DATA INSIGHT GENERATION SYSTEM | BROWN, SARA GRACE | 3625 | §101 | Final Rejection | 69d | Pending | Apr 18, 2023 |
| 18111038 | MACHINE LEARNING-BASED CONVERSATION ANALYSIS | KAWSAR, ABDULLAH AL | 2127 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 17, 2023 |
| 18106522 | EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODELS | CHEEMA, NOOR FATIMA | 2127 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 07, 2023 |
| 18101579 | SYSTEM FOR PROBABILISTIC MODELING AND MULTI-LAYER MODELING FOR DIGITAL TWINS | TRIEU, EM N | 2128 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Jan 25, 2023 |
| 18081264 | ENERGY EFFICIENT COLLABORATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) DATA CONSOLIDATION AND VALIDATION IN THE METAVERSE | HO, THOMAS Y | 2141 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 14, 2022 |
| 17891476 | MIXED SYNTHETIC DATA GENERATION | TAN, DAVID H | 2145 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 81d overdue | Pending | Aug 19, 2022 |
| 17869788 | AUTOMATED ACTION RECOMMENDER FOR STRUCTURED PROCESSES | DETERDING, GWYNEVERE AMELIA | 2125 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 20, 2022 |
| 17868262 | EVENT PROCESSING AND PREDICTION UPDATING AT A DIGITAL TWIN | WHITE, JAY MICHAEL | 2188 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 19, 2022 |
| 17825481 | SYSTEM FOR MODELLING A DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEM OF AN ENTERPRISE AS A MONOLITHIC ENTITY USING A DIGITAL TWIN | SUN, ANDREW NMN | 2195 | §103 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | May 26, 2022 |
| 17560511 | INTERACTIVE INTERVENTION PLATFORM | ZHEN, LI B | 2121 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 23, 2021 |
| 17195890 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MACHINE LEARNING BASED USER EXPERIENCE EVALUATION FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES | HATCHER, DEIRDRE D | 3625 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 294d overdue | Pending | Mar 09, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAccenture Global Solutions Limited has 27 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 19 art units and 27 examiners.
Mehmet Yesildag has the most, with 1 of Accenture Global Solutions Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
