Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Accretive Technology Group Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner, KUCAB, JAMIE R, is currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action.
The focus on 1 distinct art unit indicates a specific technical area of interest for the company's current filings. Because KUCAB, JAMIE R is the only examiner for the 1 pending office action, the company's immediate success is tied to a single individual's review process. This lack of examiner variety means the company's current prosecution strategy is highly centralized. For a company with 1 pending office action, the outcome of this single case in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area is the sole determinant of its current patent success. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit requires a focused strategy tailored to the specific requirements of KUCAB, JAMIE R.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUCAB, JAMIE R | 1 | 67.2% | +36.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18930147 | System and Methods for Implementing Blockchain Based Zero Knowledge Protocol | KUCAB, JAMIE R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18930147 | System and Methods for Implementing Blockchain Based Zero Knowledge Protocol | KUCAB, JAMIE R | 3699 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAccretive Technology Group Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jamie R Kucab has the most, with 1 of Accretive Technology Group Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
