Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Accudyne Systems Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 examiner, HARM, NICKOLAS R, within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly focused and singular point of contact for the company's current prosecution.
The busiest examiner, HARM, NICKOLAS R, handles the 1 pending office action, which accounts for the total pending workload. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution is subject to the specific standards and procedures of that single group. The 1 to 1 ratio of pending office actions to examiners means that the outcome of this single matter will define the current success of the portfolio.
Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific preferences of this 1 examiner, as there are no other distinct examiners or art units to provide a broader context. This singular focus allows for a very dedicated approach to the 1 pending office action. For a company in the Chemistry & Materials sector, this single action represents the entirety of their current engagement with the patent office. Success depends on navigating the specific standards of the 1 distinct art unit involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARM, NICKOLAS R | 1 | 79.5% | +5.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19211358 | PREPREG COMPOSITE MATERIAL PLY AND BACKING SEPARATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS | HARM, NICKOLAS R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1745 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19211358 | PREPREG COMPOSITE MATERIAL PLY AND BACKING SEPARATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS | HARM, NICKOLAS R | 1745 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 19, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAccudyne Systems Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Nickolas R Harm has the most, with 1 of Accudyne Systems Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
