Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Accurence Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit and is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. The current state of the portfolio indicates a singular focus in its active prosecution. By having only 1 pending action, the company can dedicate its full attention to the specific requirements of this application within the Transportation sector. This concentration allows for a streamlined approach to managing the company's intellectual property.
AMIT HEMANTKUMAR PATEL is the busiest examiner for the company, managing the 1 pending office action. With only 1 examiner involved in the 1 pending matter, the company's current patent office interactions are consolidated. This provides a clear and direct path for addressing the requirements of the pending application. Practitioners can develop a targeted strategy for AMIT HEMANTKUMAR PATEL, ensuring that the response is tailored to the specific examination style of the 1 distinct examiner currently overseeing the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATEL, AMIT HEMANTKUMAR | 1 | 54.9% | +6.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18811159 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATING PROPERTY DAMAGE EVENT RESPONSE WORKFLOW | PATEL, AMIT HEMANTKUMAR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3696 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18811159 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATING PROPERTY DAMAGE EVENT RESPONSE WORKFLOW | PATEL, AMIT HEMANTKUMAR | 3696 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial