Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Accutar Biotechnology Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Accutar Biotechnology Inc. has 5 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. The portfolio is highly distributed, with 5 distinct examiners each handling a portion of the workload. This distribution between pending actions and examiners indicates that no individual examiner has a dominant influence over the current prosecution pipeline. Such a distribution can be advantageous as it mitigates the risk of a single difficult examiner stalling the entire portfolio.

The 5 pending office actions are spread across 3 distinct art units, showing some level of technological variety within the company's primary field. HUTTER, GILLIAN A is identified as the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Practitioners should prepare for varied feedback given the involvement of 3 distinct art units, which may have different standards for disclosure or utility. Managing 5 distinct examiners requires a flexible strategy that accounts for individual procedural preferences.

Despite the variety, the concentration in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals area remains the defining characteristic of these 5 pending office actions. The involvement of multiple art units suggests that the company's research spans multiple sub-specialties, requiring a nuanced approach to each filing. Because HUTTER, GILLIAN A only handles 1 pending office action, the applicant must maintain active communication channels with the other distinct examiners to ensure consistent progress across the current pending matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
1
Medium (20%)
2
Easy (40%)
1
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting only1 (20%)
No statute on record1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
60% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUTTER, GILLIAN A 1 54.5% +46.2%
KOSACK, JOSEPH R 1 74.8% -6.2%
SANDERSON, LEE E 1 45.4% +44.6%
SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH 1 68.3% +27.0%
WILLIS, DOUGLAS M 1 82.4% +19.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18263656 SUBSTITUTED PYRROLOPYRIMIDINE AND PYRAZOLOPYRIMIDINE AS BRUTON'S TYROSINE KINASE (BTK) DEGRADERS WILLIS, DOUGLAS M —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18476063 HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS E3 LIGASE INHIBITORS SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18707106 NOVEL SPIROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS KLHDC2 LIGANDS HUTTER, GILLIAN A —
18404740 CHROMAN DERIVATIVES HAVING ESTROGEN RECEPTOR DEGRADATION ACTIVITY AND USES THEREOF SANDERSON, LEE E —
18476063 HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS E3 LIGASE INHIBITORS SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH —
18263656 SUBSTITUTED PYRROLOPYRIMIDINE AND PYRAZOLOPYRIMIDINE AS BRUTON'S TYROSINE KINASE (BTK) DEGRADERS WILLIS, DOUGLAS M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3991 2
1629 1
1624 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18707106 NOVEL SPIROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS KLHDC2 LIGANDS HUTTER, GILLIAN A — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 02, 2024
18591704 CHROMAN DERIVATIVES HAVING ESTROGEN RECEPTOR DEGRADATION ACTIVITY AND USES THEREOF KOSACK, JOSEPH R 3991 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
18404740 CHROMAN DERIVATIVES HAVING ESTROGEN RECEPTOR DEGRADATION ACTIVITY AND USES THEREOF SANDERSON, LEE E 3991 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 04, 2024
18476063 HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS E3 LIGASE INHIBITORS SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH 1629 §101§102 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 27, 2023
18263656 SUBSTITUTED PYRROLOPYRIMIDINE AND PYRAZOLOPYRIMIDINE AS BRUTON'S TYROSINE KINASE (BTK) DEGRADERS WILLIS, DOUGLAS M 1624 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2023

Managing Accutar Biotechnology Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month