Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Acon Finland OY Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This case is assigned to 1 distinct art unit. The presence of only 1 pending action indicates a narrow or highly targeted prosecution effort at this time. This concentration allows for a focused legal approach within this specific technical domain without the need to manage multiple competing deadlines across different units.
JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner, this person handles all current pending matters for the company. The data shows a direct relationship between the 1 pending action and the 1 distinct art unit. Consequently, the success of the company's current patent filing depends on the specific examination style of JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA. Practitioners should tailor their arguments to the specific preferences of this examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA | 1 | 50.6% | +48.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19127120 | Trampoline Frame Structure | JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19127120 | Trampoline Frame Structure | JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA | 3784 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 04, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial